Railway Bridge Construction in Malaya (Continued)
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Railway Bridge Construction in Malaya (Continued)

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 8, Issue 12, 1930

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 8, Issue 12, 1930

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

III.-DESIGN OF PERMANENT BRIDGES.
(1) Basic considerations. The problem of bridge design properly regarded, is first of all a hydraulic and only secondly a structural one. Neglect of this truth fosters uneconomic design such as the adoption of spans longer than would be needed if attention were given to increasing the rate of discharge of the stream channel by making it smoother, steeper, straighter and better guided-improvements often attainable
by a judicious use of wing walls, aprons and spurs. It is too often taken for granted that the object of a bridge is to carry a track over water, whereas the proper point of view is that the object of a bridge is to pass water under a track. Bridges in different countries reveal this difference in the habit of thought of their respective designers. Thus, in the plains of North China, all bridges have their inlet and outlet channels guided on each side by substantial rubble-pitched spurseveral chains long; in Sumatra the principle is carried still further and the Dutch engineers have 0ccasionally made works amounting almost to a canalisation of the river for a short distance above and below a bridge.

John Edwin Holmstrom

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 12

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Aesthetic Side of Structural and Constructional Engineering</h4>

The Aesthetic Side of Structural and Constructional Engineering

It is perhaps inevitable that the architect and the engineer should regard structure from a slightly different angle. This condition is more particularly evident in the case where the architect, by circumstance or temperament, is in the first place an artist. Howard Robertson

Author – Robertson, Howard
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Discussion on "A Comparison of English and Foreign Building Laws."</h4>

Discussion on "A Comparison of English and Foreign Building Laws."

The CHAIRMAN said they were all extremely obliged to Mr. Cottew for his paper, and it was much to be regretted there were not more members present to listen to it. He asked the meeting to express its approval and appreciation of Mr. Cottew for the trouble he had put himself to in preparing the paper.

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Correspondence</h4>

Correspondence

SIR,-The Calculations for a reinforced concrete hangar as given by Mr. C. E. Holloway, M.I.S.E., in your September issue, were, I consider, extremely interesting and clear.

Price – £10