Forums

Our forums are intended to allow both structural engineers and non-structural engineers to discuss the matters which affect them, obtain help with any queries and act as a useful way in which to communicate.

For more information, please visit the I need help or frequently asked questions areas.

General Public forum for all website users to post comments or queries
Institution Forums > General > Steel beam bearing in plane of a wall View modes: 
User avatar
Site User
Site User
eng.nmarko@outlook.com - 30/08/2017 21:20:01
   
Steel beam bearing in plane of a wall
Hello everybody,

What is the best way to support I beam on a cavity wall if the beam is placed in plane of the wall? And how to calculate correctly?

I'm considering common situation, UC203 steel beam on a cavity wall (lets say 100mm brick + 100mm cavity + 100mm 3.9N block).

I suggest three ways, and I would really appreciate if somene could give me comments about this ones or suggest something else:

Sketch: https://ibb.co/cYuXmk

1) bearing plate - steel plate same width as the wall
2) unreinforced two precast padstones on each wall leaf
3) unreinforced cast in situ padstone, width as the wall

My observation is that:
1) is probably a bit more expensive and more time consuming than 2) and 3), because this steel piece must be custom produced, but from structural point of view it is giving even stress distribution on masonry (I'm not sure if this plate can create cold bridge)
2) it is easy for installation, doesn't make cold bridge, but from structural point of view I'm afraid this can make moments due to eccentricity of the beam and later wall deflection, cracking etc.
3) not so easy for installation, requires formwork, pouring of concrete, concrete curing, can make cold bridge, but structuraly very solid

In sketch I made one question mark:
I need maximal value of L1-L2 or by words: I would like to know where I can cut the beam, as I assume it doesn't need to be up to the end of bearing plate/padstone, but I don't know how much exactly.
Probably in case of bearing plate, beam can be shorter because plate is very stiff compared to masonry and it will distribute load even when there is big 'cantilever' L1-L2
In case of concrete padstone, force is being transfered with 45deg angle, so I think L2 can be shorter than L1 for padstone depth.

And one more question:
Is there some recommendation for minimal bearing plate thickness. I know it can be calculated but is there some minimal value like 10-12 mm?

Thanks

User avatar
Member (MIStructE)
Member (MIStructE)
Christopher Tomlin - 07/12/2017 17:16:39
   
RE:Steel beam bearing in plane of a wall
The sketches can all be used.  May i suggest you search findanengineer.com there will be a local engineer happy to provide the service you require


PLEASE NOTE: Users seeking advice on home improvements or adaptations should consult a structural engineer using our Building Confidence service, where you can locate a trustworthy professional near you and get the advice you need to ensure your works are safe and secure. No advice provided within the forum can be guaranteed by the Institution, neither can it be a substitute for a consultation on site.

It is important that before using any of the Institution forums, that you have read and understood our complete terms and conditions of use.
 


All of the pages on this website are the copyright © of The Institution of Structural Engineers.

The Institution of Structural Engineers, International HQ, 47-58 Bastwick Street, London, EC1V 3PS, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7235 4535 Fax: +44 (0)20 7235 4294
Registered with the Charity Commission for England and Wales No. 233392 and in Scotland No. SC038263
Follow us on: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Youtube The Structural Engineer Jobs