The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 10 (1932) > Issues > Issue 1 > The Effect of Existing Regulations on Pillar Design in Steel-framed Buildings
Name of File 1231-10-01.pdf cached at 26/04/2019 11:07:10 - with 13 pages. pdfPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\ff\ffd2e109-f57e-47ab-bf50-c46cc7eeee02.pdf. thumbPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\ffd2e109-f57e-47ab-bf50-c46cc7eeee02_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: ffd2e109-f57e-47ab-bf50-c46cc7eeee02_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

The Effect of Existing Regulations on Pillar Design in Steel-framed Buildings

The designers and manufacturers of steelwork for buildings have expressed continuously, for several years, their view that it is possible to economise to a considerable extent, and with safety, if building regulations would permit. This urge for economy has not arisen suddenly,and has no relation to an economic crisis; the urge arises from a realisation that steel can be utilised to better advantage, particularly in pillars, because greater stresses are justifiable than are at present permitted. The experience of other countries and their development of the more economical and advantageous employment of steel has been noted by British engineers. They have shown that, given less restrictions, they are capable of competing for overseas trade, but they are just as eager to utilise their steel in the most economical way in the home market. It is unquestionably the opinion of a large body of structural engineers that existing regulations are in many respects of a very conservative character and will bear rather drastic revision under several heads. F E Drury

Author(s): Drury, F E