The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 11 (1933) > Issues > Issue 9 > The Case For Structural Steel
Name of File 1394-11-09.pdf cached at 22/05/2019 18:07:26 - with 7 pages. pdfPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\b7\b7142c04-b06b-4937-a274-168b6b764916.pdf. thumbPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\b7142c04-b06b-4937-a274-168b6b764916_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: b7142c04-b06b-4937-a274-168b6b764916_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

The Case For Structural Steel

BEFORE opening the steel section of the discussion, I should like to say that I hold no brief for any one water-tight section. To my mind a structural engineer should be able and free to design and construct in any material, according to its suitability for the work in hand. A.J. Hodgkinson