The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 29 (1951) > Issues > Issue 1 > A Fundamental Approach to Prestressed Concrete Design
Name of File 2091-29-01.pdf cached at 20/04/2019 05:59:37 - with 9 pages. pdfPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\b8\b81ec9f8-dd10-46a1-86f5-0a8cad745c27.pdf. thumbPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\b81ec9f8-dd10-46a1-86f5-0a8cad745c27_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: b81ec9f8-dd10-46a1-86f5-0a8cad745c27_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

A Fundamental Approach to Prestressed Concrete Design

It has appeared to the author for some considerable time that a reluctance on the part of designers to depart from the well implanted formula M/I = f/y, and the modular ratio concept of reinforced concrete design was leading them into considerable difficulties and perplexities when tackling prestressed concrete work. As a result one frequently hears the questions, " How do you find ' I ' for a prestressed beam ?"-"What is the modular ratio for a concrete stressed so highly as to have considerable plastic deformation ?"-"How can one deal with composite construction where part of the work is prestressed and part cast in situ, the concretes being of different qualities ?"-etc. More and more elaborate formulae appear daily, which try to weigh the imponderables involved, and "guestimation" plays a large part in much design work as a consequence, the errors being safelv masked by that ever to be cherished factor of "ignorance." J.W.H. King