The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 33 (1955) > Issues > Issue 12 > Correspondence Draft Revision to B.S. 449
Name of File 2294-33-12.pdf cached at 24/09/2018 08:56:33 - with 2 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\b4\b424eebc-8727-4996-98db-38555c58ec08.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\b424eebc-8727-4996-98db-38555c58ec08_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: b424eebc-8727-4996-98db-38555c58ec08_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Correspondence Draft Revision to B.S. 449

Sir-May I refer to Mr. L. Kraus’ remarks concerning the Draft Revision of B.S. 449? It is Mr. Kraus’ opinion that the suggested design rule for single angle tension members is more complicated than its predecessors.