Name of File 3636-54-06.pdf cached at 13/12/2017 10:57:28 - with 3 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\fe\fe05bcbd-411c-421e-88fa-ae5bfabf7883.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\fe05bcbd-411c-421e-88fa-ae5bfabf7883_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: fe05bcbd-411c-421e-88fa-ae5bfabf7883_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Verulam

The subject of responsibility for and the checking of designs continues to draw comment. In earlier columns we asked to hear of their experience from engineers in commercial firms and also from consulting engineers who check submitted designs on behalf of authorities. As a chartered engineer working in the former situation Mr. M. T. Ely writes: I do not wish to enter into the arguments regarding responsibility and liability in the preparation and checking of designs and calculations; suffice to say that as a chartered engineer, working for a commercial firm, I consider myself responsible for my own designs. Heaven forbid the day should come when a checking engineer insists on a change in my design or calculations which I consider to be unnecessary or downright wrong simply to satisfy his own ideas! Verulam