Name of File 3748-55-10.pdf cached at 16/07/2018 23:30:50 - with 3 pages. pdfPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\14\14b0f8f1-7c50-47cf-8108-3ee70c9bff0f.pdf. thumbPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\14b0f8f1-7c50-47cf-8108-3ee70c9bff0f_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: 14b0f8f1-7c50-47cf-8108-3ee70c9bff0f_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article


Mr. T. N. W. Akroyd continues the discussion of the engineer's responsibilities in law and the significance of the Lord's decision in Anns' case in a lively and informative way. He writes : Why do engineers write passionately in emotive language about matters which need to be thought out carefully, logically and unemotionally? A rhetorical question, perhaps, resulting from the consumption of wine and Verulam in unequal quantities but due in particular to the letter from Mr. Tietz on the subject of Anns' case (August 1977). Verulam