The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 57 (1979) > Issues > Issue 7 > Correspondence on Structural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Columns in Service by R.N. Swamy and P
Name of File 3918-57-07.pdf cached at 15/12/2017 16:09:59 - with 1 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\d1\d1c113b7-bcc1-4a8b-9086-75fee78168ea.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\d1c113b7-bcc1-4a8b-9086-75fee78168ea_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: d1c113b7-bcc1-4a8b-9086-75fee78168ea_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Correspondence on Structural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Columns in Service by R.N. Swamy and P. Arumugasaamy

I comment on the paper 'Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete columns in service'. I would make it clear that I make no claim 'to be competent to judge the quality of the authors' work and, as is my usual practice, I first read only the synopsis. This included the comment that the creep effects of load transfer from concrete to steel should be considered at the design stage. Being a design engineer, I concluded I ,must read the full paper. Having done so, I was not able to recognise any part of the contents that appeared to support this particular conclusion. There appeared to be no consideration of the effect on the ultimate capacity or serviceability of the column, which I understand to be the material criteria for design. There was a reference to the relationship between observed steel stresses and the CP 114 value of 'working stress', but I respectfully submit that the authors misunderstand this Code, as it is not actually based on working stresses but on factored ultimate stresses-a fundamentally different concept that makes the comparison meaningless. J.A. Tanner