The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 60 (1982) > Issues > Issue 12 > Future Building Regulations
Name of File 4178-60-12.pdf cached at 19/04/2019 17:38:42 - with 3 pages. pdfPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\4d\4d2b3cb7-7777-4cc3-84a3-5f3d80f529d1.pdf. thumbPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\4d2b3cb7-7777-4cc3-84a3-5f3d80f529d1_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: 4d2b3cb7-7777-4cc3-84a3-5f3d80f529d1_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Future Building Regulations

Building Regulations-whether fees for building control, private certification, form and content, extension of the national regulations to Inner London-have been under active consideration by the Institution in discussions with the Department of the Environment, on the one hand, and with the Institution membership, on the other, for nearly 4 years. In the notes that follow Mr James Sutherland (Harris & Sutherland; Chairman of the Institution’s Working Party on Building Regulations; member of the Building Regulations Advisory Committee), Mr Stefan Tietz (S. B. Tietz & Partners; member of the Institution’s Working Party; member of the Joint Committee on Building Legislation), and Mr Raymond Cousins (Cyril Blumfield & Partners; member of the Joint Committee) give their personal views on Building Regulations. These views should stimulate much discussion from the floor-and in writing from those unable to attend on 13 January 1983. R.J.M. Sutherland, S.B. Tietz and R.J.R. Cousins