The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 62 (1984) > Issues > Issue 5 > Continuous rc Slabs - Reconciling Theory with Practice
Name of File 4702-62-05.pdf cached at 13/12/2017 08:59:12 - with 2 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\02\021e3108-5196-469d-a61a-a6adb2ed3713.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\021e3108-5196-469d-a61a-a6adb2ed3713_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: 021e3108-5196-469d-a61a-a6adb2ed3713_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Continuous rc Slabs - Reconciling Theory with Practice

The design of continuous reinforced concrete slabs is a routine item-moments are taken from CP114 Table 15 or CP110 Table 4 (according to taste), reinforcement is calculated and it is then placed according to normal detailing practice: it is customary to stop off top reinforcement at 0.25 L or 0.3 L from a support (L = span). Yet, as Beeby has pointed out in a recent paper3, this situation contains a paradox. Both Codes specify similar theoretical rules for curtailing reinforcement-e.g. CPllO cl. 3.11.7.1: ‘ . . . every bar should extend, except at end supports, beyond the point at which it is no longer needed for a distance equal to the effective depth of the member, or twelve times the size of the bar, whichever is greater. . . ’. A.N. Beal