The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 63 (1985) > Issues > Issue 3 > Correspondence on Viewpoint on Why Not WL/8? by Andrew Beeby
Name of File 4778-63-03.pdf cached at 14/12/2017 20:59:39 - with 1 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\bb\bbc6df85-8af9-468e-88a9-3611c09e9f20.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\bbc6df85-8af9-468e-88a9-3611c09e9f20_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: bbc6df85-8af9-468e-88a9-3611c09e9f20_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Correspondence on Viewpoint on Why Not WL/8? by Andrew Beeby

I think that the general issues raised by the feature are important not only for reinforced concrete construction but also for the future of the whole of British industry. Dr. Beeby’s main plea, I think, is for ‘realistic simplicity’, and I support this completely. Mr. Dennis Cox