The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 64 (1986) > Issues > Issue 8 > The New Concrete Code - is it all it's Cracked up to be?
Name of File 4896-64-08.pdf cached at 23/02/2019 02:56:10 - with 3 pages. pdfPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\9a\9a063f84-cc70-4ad1-a25c-ac60956e9061.pdf. thumbPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\9a063f84-cc70-4ad1-a25c-ac60956e9061_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: 9a063f84-cc70-4ad1-a25c-ac60956e9061_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

The New Concrete Code - is it all it's Cracked up to be?

The recent history of Codes of Practice for structural concrete work in the UK has hardly been happy. For evidence of this, one need look no further than the sorry case of CPllO1, which was introduced as a new Code in 1972 and withdrawn in 1985, while the predecessor it was meant to replace, CP1142, is still in use today. It is widely accepted that CPllO did not live up to expectations, earning a reputation of being cumbersome to use and requiring over-complex calculations for simple problems. CP110’s successor, BS8110, has been a long time in preparation- partly because a completely new text was prepared, with the intention of producing a more acceptable document. Has it succeeded? Despite its substantial improvements in presentation, the omens are not promising. Already, a ‘design manual’ has been published by the Institution and a draft revised CP114 has been published by the Campaign for Practical Codes of Practices, both claiming to be simpler to use and more in line with practising engineers’ needs. Only time will tell whether BS8llO wil gain the general acceptance that eluded its predecessor. A.N. Beal