The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 7 (1929) > Issues > Issue 10 > "Some American Comparisons"
Name of File 1246-07-10.pdf cached at 11/12/2017 06:03:57 - with 16 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\66\668de407-1dd5-4f1e-8e3c-523db881cb66.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\668de407-1dd5-4f1e-8e3c-523db881cb66_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: 668de407-1dd5-4f1e-8e3c-523db881cb66_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

"Some American Comparisons"

As a young English engineer visiting U.S.A. and Canada for the first time I found very much to interest me. On every side one sees progressiveness, efficiency and a readiness to revise building regulations and structural practices to keep abreast of the times. In a very few weeks I became aware that we in England are falling behind our American confreres-not because our engineers or architects are less intelligent or efficient, but seemingly because we are hemmed in by hide bound authorities, regulations and old established practices. In these days of fierce competition in the field of foreign trade, when every extra cost in building finds its way by overhead charges to the cost of our manufactures, it is the duty of us all "ruthlessly to scrap all methods and machinely which do not come up to the most modern standard" -to quote the words of the Prince of Wales, who as a well travelled young man is constantly appealing for a change of ideas in Britain. G.S. Bowers

Author(s): Bowers, G S