Name of File 6332-77-07.pdf cached at 12/12/2017 23:37:14 - with 2 pages. pdfPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\6a\6a71fc77-d7f7-4753-8884-1883cf5da585.pdf. thumbPath: E:\\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\6a71fc77-d7f7-4753-8884-1883cf5da585_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: 6a71fc77-d7f7-4753-8884-1883cf5da585_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article


CPD - debate continues Verulam's postbag has bulged with comment on CPD. Eric Hewitt from Bosham, near Chichester; has some positive proposals for full and relevant training. He writes: The concerns expressed in Chris Bailey’s letter (2 February 1999) could perhaps be met by considering the use of the NVQ Level 4 in Civil & Structural Engineering Design awarded jointly by the Institution and others. This nationally acceptable award starts from the premise of an underpinning knowledge-base of a graduate engineer. Whether it is used to gain the award for the candidate, or as a framework for CPD is a decision for the employer and employee which will depend on a number of factors.