The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 90 (2012) > Issues > Issue 9 > A case for physical models
Name of File CasePhysModels.pdf cached at 15/12/2017 12:20:10 - with 7 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\7c\7cc2813a-d9d5-4775-a3f7-04afcf2bde2e.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\7cc2813a-d9d5-4775-a3f7-04afcf2bde2e_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: 7cc2813a-d9d5-4775-a3f7-04afcf2bde2e_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

A case for physical models

This paper discusses the relevance of physical models in the contemporary design of building structures. It starts with a brief overview of the use of physical models in the last 100 years, followed by a description of some recent projects where physical scale modelling played an active role in the design development. The examples are used to illustrate various categories of physical models: namely conceptual models; form-fi nding models and experimental scale models, and to analyse the limitations of physical models in contrast to digital tools. Ultimately, physical models are presented as a tool to be used in conjunction with and alongside the computer.

Author(s): D. Azagra and T. Hay

Keywords: models, buildings, design, HISTORY, 20th century, thin shells, concrete, folkestone academy, folkestone, kent, gridshells, weald and downland open air museum, chichester, west sussex