The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 94 (2016) > Issue 3 > Viewpoint: Should we now say “design and analysis” and not “analysis and design”?
Name of File Viewpoint-Sanderson.pdf cached at 15/12/2017 06:35:51 - with 2 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\a8\a83987ba-4dbe-4238-9add-c52992294260.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\a83987ba-4dbe-4238-9add-c52992294260_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: a83987ba-4dbe-4238-9add-c52992294260_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Viewpoint: Should we now say “design and analysis” and not “analysis and design”?

David Sanderson, Product Development Manager, Engineering Structures Division, Trimble, gives his perspective on developments in structural engineering software and asks whether it is time to starting thinking in terms of “design and analysis”, if not just “design”.

Author(s): D. Sanderson (Trimble)