Institution Notes
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Institution Notes

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 64, Issue 7, 1986

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 64, Issue 7, 1986

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Birthday honours
Council have offered warm congratulations to Mr John Derrington, FEng (a Past President
of both the Institution and the Institution of Civil Engineers) who was made a
CBE in the Birthday honours list and to Mr Guy Barrett (F) (President, British Constructional Steelwork Association Ltd.) who received the OBE.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 7

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Open Discussion on Why Not WL/8? by A.W. Beeby</h4>

Open Discussion on Why Not WL/8? by A.W. Beeby

Mr R. J. M. Sutherland (F) (Harris & Sutherland): It would be hard not to agree with all that Andrew Beeby has said. I would just like to swing the emphasis a bit.

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Joints in steel frames In April Mr Denis Wall queried the detailing of knee joints in portal frames, with reference to the BCSA publication, Details of single-bay single-storey portal frame sheds. Mr L. H. Lewis of Banstead, Surrey, has now provided us with the following commentary: If we consider the column alone, with the rafter removed, and we replace the rafter with the forces it imposes on the column, we have the arrangement shown in Fig 1. Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Formating of Structural Codes</h4>

The Formating of Structural Codes

Despite the recent publication of new, revised and draft Codes of Practice for the structural use of various materials, the debate over the most suitable form for such documents does not lessen. To a degree, there is always likely to be argument as long as one document seeks to meet a range of contrasting requirements of, for example, designers and checkers, comprehensiveness and limitation of scope, continuity of approach, and response to new knowledge and developments. J.F.A. Moore

Price – £10