Continuous Construction in Steel for Roofs and Composite Floors
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Continuous Construction in Steel for Roofs and Composite Floors

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 65, Issue 10, 1987

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 65, Issue 10, 1987

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

A form of limited continuous construction: suitable for use in multistorey buildings designed as non-sway frames, is described. The method employs a two-way grid of beam and continuous tibs sitting on double spine beam which pass on each side of the columns. Fabrication and erection are thereby simplified. A number of design issues raised by the use of continuous composite beam, continuous beam restrained by roof decking and columns subject to biaxial bending are discussed in the light of both current Codes of Practice and recent research.

P.R. Brett, D.A. Nethercott and G.W. Owens

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 10

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Bending moments in brickwork panels Mr A. Aiken's letter, published in July, has prompted several replies. Mr J. E. Saul writes to us from Mold, Clwyd: Mr Aiken's problem is that he has not realised that brick panel design in BS5628: Part l is based on plastic principles. Well mostly, that is panel analysis is, but section analysis is not that is elastic. Anyone could be excused for making this mistake since, apart from being confusing, it is also well wrapped up by the Code writers. Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Use of Bed-Joint Reinforcement in Brick Buildings to Resist Settlement</h4>

Use of Bed-Joint Reinforcement in Brick Buildings to Resist Settlement

The paper proposes some rules for selecting bed-joint reinforcement in brick facade walls which may be susceptible to settlement. Loading criteria are adopted in preference to deformation criteria, and the importance of specifying a minimum amount of reinforcement and of the need to provide ductility is emphasised. The use of the equations is demonstrated on a four-storey wall. Professor I.A. MacLeod

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Discussion on the Design and Construction of the Diplomatic Club, Riyadh by Professor E. Happold, Mr</h4>

Discussion on the Design and Construction of the Diplomatic Club, Riyadh by Professor E. Happold, Mr

Mr Liddell: There was really only one suitable fabric for the roses - teflon-coated glass fabric cloth-but, for a variety of reasons, alternatives were considered during the design stages, the main reason being that Frei Otto distrusted the material because of a disastrous experience at Cologne in 1957 with glass fibre cloth coated with PVC. Glass fibres do not degrade in sunlight in the way that organic fibres do, but they are weakened by water and are brittle and hence can suffer mechanical damage.

Price – £10