N/A
Standard: £10 + VATMembers/Subscribers: Free
Members/Subscribers, log in to access
The Structural Engineer, Volume 74, Issue 22, 1996
SEPIA More members have expressed concern regarding SEPIA and the supplementary charges being levied on them. Mr A. R. Glaysher writes from Dorking, Surrey: We note with interest the letter from Mr T. A. Collinson regarding SEPIA (Verulam, 20 August 1996). We are unable to comment in too much detail, since our withdrawal from SEPIA and the exceedingly high release premiums are in the hands of our solicitors. Verulam
This viewpoint presents ideas and suggestions for those preparing to take the Institution’s Part 3 (Membership) examination. It is a personal view based on the author’s own recent experience. P.C. Lynch
The structure shown in Fig 1 (a) is taken from a 20-item test for an understanding of structural behaviour. In the preamble to the test, it is explained that roller supports, in the structure at point D, can sustain a reaction in either direction, normal to the direction of the roller. The test was the basis of a 15-year study, the control group for which was the graduate entry to the Ove Arup Partnership. D.M. Brohn