Portland Cement: Discussion on Mr Gutteridge's Paper
Date published

1 January 1933

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Portland Cement: Discussion on Mr Gutteridge's Paper

Tag
Author
Date published
1 January 1933
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 10, Issue 1, 1932

Date published

1 January 1933

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 10, Issue 1, 1932

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Dr Oscar Faber said the paper hardly lent itself to discussion in the ordinary manner, because it was such an excellent description of modern cement manufacture,and nobody could argue with anything that was said in the paper. That made it more difficult to arouse at any rate a very fierce discussion. The first years of his own college course were spent in a cement works, and he had been interested in cement ever since, and for that reason he had appreciated the paper very much. In referring to the universal practice of adding gypsum to make cement slow setting, the author said this is added to the extent of anywhere between 2 per cent, and 3 per cent., but the British Standard specification required that it should not exceed 2.75 per cent. This obviously meant that there was some objection to gypsum if it were introduced in
excessive quantities. The objection to gypsum was that an excess of it made a cement what was known as unsound, and it gave the cement certain properties which were deleterious to a permanent concrete.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 1

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Employment of Structural Engineers as Specialists: Discussion on Mr Creswell's Paper</h4>

The Employment of Structural Engineers as Specialists: Discussion on Mr Creswell's Paper

The President, proposing a very hearty vote of thanks to Mr. Creswell for having put the matter so clearly before the members, said he was wondering when structural engineers would have the opportunity to acquire legal knowledge in addition to all the scientific knowledge they must possess; perhaps the matter was one which might be placed before the Institution’s Board of Examiners. Mr W.C.Cocking(Past Member of Council) paid a tribute to Mr. Creswell in respect of his very happy knack of drawing the attention of professional men to various matters, often of very great importance, but which had previously escaped their attention, and said that the paper referred to many matters which professional men did not often consider.

Date – 1 January 1933
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Corrigenda</h4>

Corrigenda

We very much regret that the following printers' errors occurred in the December issue of The Structural Engineer :- Page 398- "Stewart & Partridges,Limited" should read "Stewart & Partners, Limited" Page 404- The figure "330 O.D." should read "300 O.D." Page 409-"Chief Surveyor" should read "Chief Quantity Surveyor" Page 42-"Breaking of cracks" should read "Breathing of Cracks".

Date – 1 January 1933
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Correspondence</h4>

Correspondence

To the Editor of The Structural Engineer. Water-Cement Ratio. Sir,-In reference to Mr. C S Gray’s letter,Professor Duff A Abrams states that "Aggregates of equivalent concrete making qualities may be produced by an indefinite number of different gradings of a given material." "Aggregates of equivalent concrete qualities may be produced from materials of widely different size and grading." "In general, fine and coarse aggregates of widely different size or grading can be combined in such a manner as to produce similar results in concrete." The meaning seems to point clearly to the fact that size or grading may vary widely in each aggregate, but not the different aggregates unless they have equivalent concrete qualities. W D Williams

Date – 1 January 1933
Price – £10