Correspondence. The Development of Paddington Station
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Correspondence. The Development of Paddington Station

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 15, Issue 3, 1937

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 15, Issue 3, 1937

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

I have read the report of the discussion on the above paper in the current issue and
note that the author in reply to one of my queries, states, “the foundations were designed to allow of two additional floors being added.”

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 3

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Steelwork in Buildings - Thirty Years' Progress. Discussion on Mr. S. Bylander's Paper</h4>

Steelwork in Buildings - Thirty Years' Progress. Discussion on Mr. S. Bylander's Paper

The CHAIRMAN (Mr. P.J. Black, L.R.I.B.A., M.I.Struct,.E., Vice-President), introduced Mr. Bylander as one of the oldest memhers of the Concrete Institute, being in fact a Founder Member of the Institute, and said that he was regarded as one of tho pioneers of steel-frame buildings. His paper was a very interesting retrospect and it showed the evolution of the steelframe building.

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Steel Scaffolding. Discussion on Mr. P.M. Andrews's Paper</h4>

Steel Scaffolding. Discussion on Mr. P.M. Andrews's Paper

Mr. Andrews, in presenting the paper, took the opportunity to put a number of questions to members, in the hope that, answers might be given during the discussion. After stating that he had no connection, either directly or indirectly, with any scaffolding firm here or abroad, he pointed out that the tubes were designed originally for the conveyance of steam, water or gas, and, therefore, were designed to withstand continuous internal pressure. As we were using precisely the same tubes in scaffolding and were using them as columns, we were subjecting them to a form of pressure entirely different from that for which they were designed. His first question was whether the 6-gauge weldless tube was as satisfactory as the ordinary welded tube when used as a column. Secondly, the hollow tube, used as a column, was a very good section provided that, the load on it were concentric, but if the load were applied eccentrically the hollow steel column was about the weakest section possible. Therefore, he asked whether it was possible to load such columns concentrically. The tubes were fixed together by means of couplers, so that each coupler conveyed the load to the tube, and there seemed to be a distance of about 2 inches from centre to centre; therefore, the eccentricity on the column should be 2 inches. He had calculated that a 1 1/2 in., 6-gauge tube, 6 ft. long, used as a column, would carry about 2 1/2 tons if loaded concentrically; but the moment it was loaded with an eccentricity of 2 ins. it would carry only about 9 or 10 cwts. That seemed to be rather important in considering the design of steel scaffolding, and he hoped that an expert would describe the eccentricity on the tube and a means of overcoming it; he believed there were methods of overcoming eccentricity in steel scaffolding.

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Reconstruction and Widening of the Margaret Bridge Over the Danube at Budapest</h4>

The Reconstruction and Widening of the Margaret Bridge Over the Danube at Budapest

The Margaret Bridge in Budapest, was built from l872 to 1876 by the French firm Messrs. Ernest Gouin (later known as Cie. Batignolles, Paris) whose plan was awarded the first prize in the international competition for the design of the bridge advertised by the Hungarian Government. Charles Szechy

Author – Szechy, Charles
Price – £10