Notes From Abroad
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Notes From Abroad

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 2, Issue 2, 1924

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 2, Issue 2, 1924

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Heat Insulation.
UNDER the supervision of Prof. A. Bugge, of the Norwegian Technical Academy, a series of 24 huts were erected, identical as to design and dimensions, but differing as to the materials used in construction. These huts consisted of a single chamber, 6 ft. 6 3/4 in, by 6 ft. 6 3/4 in. by 7 ft. 4 1/2 in., built over a cellar, which, together with the roof, was carefully insulated. Each hut was heated by electricity, automatically controlled by a thermo-regulator. Thermal measurements were taken during l 1/2 winters. These measurements were plotted, the results obtained with a wooden-framed house being taken as 100 for purposes of comparison. The two huts which directly interest our readers were hut 8, built of three-air-duct concrete blocks on the Lean system, fixed by means of tarred dowels, the hollow spaces being filled with coke breeze at floor level to a depth equal to the thickness of the floor, matchboarded
and plastered. This was rated at 140. Hut 18, with walls of High-Rib lathing fixed to wood framing, the external wall with 1 1/4 in. plaster rendering, the inner lathing rendered with 3/4 in. of plaster, a space of 5 in. being left between the two sections. This was rated at 129. The best insulated house was constructed of two walls of matchboard, packed between with sawdust; rated at 96.5. It was found that hollow walls gave better insulation than solid walls, but where these are built of bricks or blocks the mortar between joints should not be allowed to obtrude inwardly or droppings of mortar to accumulate. That in hollow walls, the heaviest and thickest should invariably be the inner one, so as to guard it against damp. It was found that a lightly-burnt brick was a better non-conductor than a hard burnt brick; it was therefore recommended that the bulk of the wall should be built of medium bricks with hard brick outside skin. (Teknisk ukebald.)
Messrs. H. Kreuger and A. Erikson,

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Feature Issue 2

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Strength of Concrete; its Relation to the Cement, Aggregates and Water</h4>

The Strength of Concrete; its Relation to the Cement, Aggregates and Water

THE above heading is the title of a recent paper dealing with the prortioning of concrete. The information is of such value that it is proposed to give a summary of the paper arranged so that the main divisions will be similar to thosc of the Bulletin fo facilitate reference. J. Singleton-Green

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Protection of Sea Walls from Attrition</h4>

The Protection of Sea Walls from Attrition

The subject of the attrition of concrete surfaces exposed to sea action was dealt with by me in a paper read on January 22nd, 1920, before the Concrete Institute, now known as the lnstitutim of Structural Engineers. The object of the present communication is to describe the results of the experiments referred to in that paper. I endeavoured there to analyse the mechanism of attrition, going on from that to investigate the factors governing, and the possible methods for reducing attrition. It was shown that the injury to the concrete surface was primarily due to a fracturing and breaking away of the particles forming that surface, the conditions being exceptionally favourable for the removal of the broken material by the water. In the latter respect such surfaces as are now considered differ fundamentally from horizontal surfaces upon which the products of disintegration are allowed to collect in the form of dust, forming a protecting layer. It was shown, broadly, that whether or not surface would resist the attack of boulders driven against it by the sea would depend upon two main factors :-(n) The stress produced on the material by the blows of the boulders.(b) The resistance of such material to disintegration. Dr. J.S. Owens

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Presidential Address. The Centenary of the Invention of Portland Cement</h4>

The Presidential Address. The Centenary of the Invention of Portland Cement

Ladies and Gentlemen, With the example of my illustrious predecessors before me, I feel that I am at a loss in knowing how to give you such an Address as will be a worthy follower to those which have already been delivered to this Institution. Major James Petrie

Price – £10