Prestressed Steel Structures Discussion on Professor Magnel’s Paper
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Prestressed Steel Structures Discussion on Professor Magnel’s Paper

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 29, Issue 7, 1951

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 29, Issue 7, 1951

Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

THE CHAIRMAN introduced Professor MAGNEL, who then summarised his paper. At the conclusion, he said he did not claim that we had arrived at the final stage of the developments discussed. But, pointing to the necessity for economy in steel, in view of the large quantities needed for re-armament, he said the Americans were putting a lot of people out of work because there was not sufficient steel available for buildings, and so on, and in his own country and ours the situation would be the same. As a sound policy to effect saving in steel he suggested, first, that we should use much more reinforced concrete than steel; secondly, we should use more and more prestressed concrete instead of reinforced concrete; and thirdly, for big spans, where prestressed concrete could not do the job, we should try to use prestressed steel.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 7

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Analysis of Single- Storey Multi - Bay Gabled Rigid Frames</h4>

The Analysis of Single- Storey Multi - Bay Gabled Rigid Frames

Gabled rigid frames are becoming increasingly common in single-storey factory construction, but where there are two or more bays the analysis by the usual methods of structural theory presents considerable difficulties in computation. This paper presents a method, based on the general conception of moment and thrust distribution, which greatly simplifies such problems. It is particularly advantageous where the structure consists of a large number of bays, where the roof members are in several straight portions or are curved, and where the members are of variable cross-section. It is also applicable to multi-span portal frame bridges. A.J. Francis

Author – Francis, A J
Price – £9.95
The Structural Engineer
Cartoon image of a woman holding a baby while working on a laptop

Viewpoint: Rethinking the return to work in an industry where mothers are still underrepresented

Niamh McCloskey reflects on her personal experience of the challenging reality of returning to work after maternity leave, questioning whether workplaces truly support women in this transition and highlighting how, with the right support and recognition of the new perspectives and skills that motherhood can bring, we can retain mothers and allow them to thrive in underrepresented industries.

Date – 1 June 2026
Author – Niamh McCloskey
Price – £9.95
The Structural Engineer
View of a highway bridge over a two-lane road in the UK

Viewpoint: Can we have confidence in inherited highway bridge assessments?

Steven McKerlie is troubled by longstanding underinvestment in maintenance of UK bridge assets and the implications of this for safety if weaknesses in past assessments that are still relied on are not acknowledged.

Date – 1 June 2026
Author – Steven McKerlie
Price – £9.95