Discussion
Date published

N/A

First published: N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

Added to basket

The Structural Engineer
Discussion
Date published

N/A

First published

N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

THE CHAIRMAN, after welcoming to the meeting the Italian Ambassador, Count Vittorio Zoppi, proposed a hearty vote of thanks to Professor Nervi for his magnificent paper. He then declared the meeting open for discussion.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 5

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
Portal Frame Analysis by Moment Area Methods Written Discussion on the Paper by Mr. J. F. Horridge

Portal Frame Analysis by Moment Area Methods Written Discussion on the Paper by Mr. J. F. Horridge

Professor R. G. ROBERTSON (Member): The Author is to be congratulated on a new principle he has used and which can be stated as follows: In a frame containing several redundants the analysis may be made in two stages.

Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
Concrete and Structural Form

Concrete and Structural Form

I AM very honoured and deeply grateful for this opportunity of meeting my English colleagues and of talking to them about some of the work I have done in the course of an already long career as designer and constructor. Pier Luigi Nervi

Author - Nervi, Pier Luigi
Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
New Concepts in the Design of Structural Concrete. Discussion on the paper by R. E. Rowe MA ScD AMlS

New Concepts in the Design of Structural Concrete. Discussion on the paper by R. E. Rowe MA ScD AMlS

Professor A. L. L. Baker (Member) opened the discussion by saying that he agreed entirely with what the authors had said in their presentation but not with what they had written in the paper. He agreed with the statistical, probabilistic approach. It was obviously the only logical way of dealing with the variations of strengths of materials and the variations and vagaries of loading. There were one or two points in the paper which Professor Baker found slightly misleading. First of all, the matter of basing a design entirely upon a probability of failure-10-7-and a minimum cost, and saying that one could not entirely guarantee a structure against failure, needed some qualification. He thought this was rather a dangerous statement.

Price - £9