The North Western Gas Board's new coal carbonising plant at Garston

Author: Cousins, H G

Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

The North Western Gas Board's new coal carbonising plant at Garston

Tag
Author
Cousins, H G
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Author

Cousins, H G

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 37, Issue 11, 1959

Date published

N/A

Author

Cousins, H G

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 37, Issue 11, 1959

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Liverpool Group is the second largest of the seventeen areas forming the North Western Gas Board. An examination of production rcquirements, made soon after the nationalisation of the gas industry, indicated that additional carbonising plant was
needed in the group. It was decided that this should be installed at Garston Gas Works and should provide for an additional 14 million cu.ft. of gas per day.

H. G. Cousins

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 11

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Presidential Address By Lewis E. Rent, BSc., M.I.Struct.E., M.I.C.E.</h4>

Presidential Address By Lewis E. Rent, BSc., M.I.Struct.E., M.I.C.E.

YOU have done me a great honour by electing I would be less than human if I did not say that I am delighted to be in this place -or that the possible occupancy of this chair has been, for some years past, one of my most cherished hopes.

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>A Commentary on the new British Standard 449 (1959) The Use of Structural Steel in Building</h4>

A Commentary on the new British Standard 449 (1959) The Use of Structural Steel in Building

The Fourth revision of the British Standard 449 “The Use of Structural Steel in Building” was published by authority of the General Council of the British Standards Institution on 27th May, 1959. This commentary is intended to draw attention to some of the major alterations that have been made and to give reasons therefor. It is not designed to be a detailed comparison on the two documents clause for clause. Such a comparison written by Mr. Lewis E. Kent has been published by the British Steelwork Association and should be consulted for this purpose. John Mason

Price – £10