Design Clauses in BS 5337 for Controlling Early Thermal and Shrinkage Cracking

Author: Hughes, B P

Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Design Clauses in BS 5337 for Controlling Early Thermal and Shrinkage Cracking

Tag
Author
Hughes, B P
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Author

Hughes, B P

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 55, Issue 3, 1977

Date published

N/A

Author

Hughes, B P

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 55, Issue 3, 1977

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Excessive cracking due to early thermal and shrinkage movement was a common defect in water retaining structures designed to CP2007: 1970 which shouldbe rectified by the new Code. The paper therefore discusses design in accordance with BS 5337: 1976 for satisfactory control of this form of cracking, and outlines the various design options which are available.

B.P. Hughes

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 3

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Block and brickwork are current subjects of correspondence from members. Mr. R. J. Rhodes raises what must be a fairly common problem : As it can prove extremely difficult, if not impossible, to prove on paper that brickwork structures, however simple, will stand up, it is essential that any assistance from internal pressure must be utilised. Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Structural Design to BS5337 (1976)</h4>

Structural Design to BS5337 (1976)

BS 5337 contains clauses which permit the use of limit state design methods for water-retaining structures. There are advantages in using the new method of design and the paper discusses the application of the relevant clauses, and compares typical designs. R.D. Anchor

Author – Anchor, R D
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Rules of Conduct as Revised October 1972. Guidance Note No. 2. Responsibility of Members called Upo</h4>

Rules of Conduct as Revised October 1972. Guidance Note No. 2. Responsibility of Members called Upo

Routine checking The task of checking the work of another structural engineer is becoming an increasingly frequent one for members of the Institution. It is a trend to be welcomed but the professional responsibility of an engineer in such checking cannot be over- emphasized.

Price – £10