Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers, log in to access
An IStructE account gives you access to a world of knowledge. Create a profile to receive details of our unique range of resources, events and training.
Dr. D. Tordoff (BCSA): We are all conscious of the fact that changes are taking place in design specifications and I should like to ask Mr Needham to comment on the changing philosophy of connection design with the introduction of limit state principles. Will a different design approach be required, and is there any research needed, or being undertaken currently, for a new design approach?
Though the steel portal frame is one of the simplest structural arrangements for covering a given area, the designer probably has to satisfy at least as many different structural criteria as for more complex structures. Present-day design of portal frames is reviewed in the light of recent research studies into certain aspects of the behaviour of portal frames, particularly the problem of stability of haunched rafters. Guidance is given for checking the lateral stability of such members. L.J. Morris
Aims of our Institution My Address coincides, in point of time, with the start of a new phase in engineering-the introduction of the Engineering Council. This Government-sponsored body is expected, in due course, with the agreement of CEI, to take over the granting of the title of ‘chartered engineer’. The Engineering Council will promote and develop the knowledge and best practice of engineering. Since we, in this Institution, have affirmed that our aim is ‘to promote the general advancement of the science and art of structural engineering’ then there can be no conflict in our respective aims. It is as well, however, to recall that whatever happens elsewhere, we have the sole right to qualify chartered structural engineers. Indeed, it appears to me important that in our pursuit of excellence in engineering, our members understand that we intend to continue to discharge this function with our accustomed vigour and energy. There is no doubt that our standards, as has been said before, are higher than those envisaged in the Finniston Report. We do not intend to lower those standards. T.N.W. Akroyd