Microcomputer Analysis of the CUBIC Space Frame
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Microcomputer Analysis of the CUBIC Space Frame

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 64, Issue 8, 1986

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 64, Issue 8, 1986

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

This paper describes a method of analysis that may be applied to the CUBIC space frame and which is suitable to run on microcomputers. The program described requires only the minimum of input, and from this information a grid numbering system is generated and a flexibility matrix derived forassumed corner supports. Subsequently, load intensities and support positions may be input and member shears, axial forces, and node deflections, determined for any number of support or load configurations. An example is given to demonstrate the capabilities of the program, and comparison is made with an established finite element analysis program.

J.C. Chilton, C. Daffern, M.L. Kubik and R.E. McConnel

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 8

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Suddenly applied loads A year ago, we published a letter from Mr N. W. Sutton in New Zealand. He asked for help in resolving what he considered to be an anomaly in the standard solution for the effect of a suddenly applied load on a beam. We received a variety of replies, which ranged from incredulity that the letter should have been published to the more academic, pointing out the limitations of the usual textbook solution that the deflection is twice that under static loading. In retrospect, the value of the contributions appears to have justified the appearance of the letter. Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The New Concrete Code - is it all it's Cracked up to be?</h4>

The New Concrete Code - is it all it's Cracked up to be?

The recent history of Codes of Practice for structural concrete work in the UK has hardly been happy. For evidence of this, one need look no further than the sorry case of CPllO1, which was introduced as a new Code in 1972 and withdrawn in 1985, while the predecessor it was meant to replace, CP1142, is still in use today. It is widely accepted that CPllO did not live up to expectations, earning a reputation of being cumbersome to use and requiring over-complex calculations for simple problems. CP110’s successor, BS8110, has been a long time in preparation- partly because a completely new text was prepared, with the intention of producing a more acceptable document. Has it succeeded? Despite its substantial improvements in presentation, the omens are not promising. Already, a ‘design manual’ has been published by the Institution and a draft revised CP114 has been published by the Campaign for Practical Codes of Practices, both claiming to be simpler to use and more in line with practising engineers’ needs. Only time will tell whether BS8llO wil gain the general acceptance that eluded its predecessor. A.N. Beal

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Structural Steelwork Fabrication</h4>

Structural Steelwork Fabrication

Despite the overall cost competitiveness of steel in construction, many steel framed buildings remain more costly to manufacture and build than they need be. Details and components often become unnecessarily complicated and expensive because the factors that govern production costs are not always appreciated. The aim of this paper is to describe the nature and sequence of routine workshop processes from plain rolled steel to the finished fabrication stage, with an explanation of the various operations that may be involved. Emphasis is placed on general building structures supported by typical examples to show the influence of basic design decisions on ultimate costs. R. Taggart

Price – £10