N/A
Standard: £10 + VATMembers/Subscribers: Free
Members/Subscribers, log in to access
The Structural Engineer, Volume 67, Issue 3, 1989
The Working Party on Quality Assurance has now submitted its report to the Engineering Committee-the following is a summary of its deliberations and recommendations. We make no apologies, however, for the fact that much of what follows has already been stated in various meetings and open discussions within the Institution and many of its Branches. Professor W.D. Biggs
How many readers practise in partnreship? How many have any kind of partnership agreement, let alone one that is properly thought-out and drafted? How many will be thinking that they don’t need to bother with partnership agreements because they’ve known their partners for years, and have always managed to sort things out over a glass of something sustaining? Why bother to pay lawyers? J.J. Ward
The Chairman: Before we have the first question, let me say that I am fascinated by this paper because, by any standard, this building must be regarded as one of historical interest so far as concrete structures are concerned. What has been done here is to save an important reinforced concrete building, a building that comes from the early beginnings of reinforced concrete in this country. There are examples of ‘Khan’ bar reinforcement in the Museum of Concrete in Amberley. Those who are interested should, when in that part of the world, take advantage of visiting the museum.