Correspondence on The Global and Local Behaviour of Bridge Deck Slabs by Dr. P.A. Jackson
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Correspondence on The Global and Local Behaviour of Bridge Deck Slabs by Dr. P.A. Jackson

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 68, Issue 12, 1990

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 68, Issue 12, 1990

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The author discusses the Ontario bridge Code with its need for only 0.3% reinforcement in each face/direction, compared with three to four times this amount when the slab is designed to BS 5400 with local and global flexure both evaluated and added algebraically. I would concur that the BS 5400 rules for maximum calculated crack width also frequently govern the amount of reinforcement. Indeed, when marine exposure conditions apply, demanding a maximum crack width of only 0.l mm, the reinforcement requirements can be almost impracticable. In this respect, the opportunity to reduce the reinforcement content is welcome.

Mr. A.C.G. Hayward

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 12

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Potential for catastrophe in building alterations The above topic, raised by Peter Mawer in our column for 20 March, attracted numerous responses, published in the journal for 15 May. Predictably, further correspondence has been received. Mr M. J. Foxton, from St. Helens, Merseyside, writes: The situation described by Mr Mawer will be very familiar to anyone engaged in local authority building control in the appraisal of submissions made for compliance with the requirements of the current Building Regulations and Part A of Schedule 1, in paticular. The local authority will, normally, require, in support, the production of such calculations and details as are necessary to demonstrate structural adequacy, including overall stability. Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Towards more Realistic Structural Evaluation</h4>

Towards more Realistic Structural Evaluation

This paper outlines the philosophy and objectives of structural evaluation and describes how the IStructE report Appraisal of existing structures can be used and interpreted to provide a practical basis for decisions concerning the current and future use of buildings for which the original design and construction information is incomplete or unavailable, or where a change of use is envisaged. R.J. Currie

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Generation of a Class of Structural Forms for Vaults and Sails</h4>

The Generation of a Class of Structural Forms for Vaults and Sails

A method is presented for the derivation of structural forms for vaults and sails which are to be designed to carry one dominant load case-dead load in the case of a heavy vault or wind load in the case of a sail. A stress function is used to describe the state of stress in the vault or sail. The stress function is derived from the Biot-Savart law used in electromagnetic theory. C.J.K. Williams

Price – £10