First published: N/A
Standard: £9 + VAT
An IStructE account gives you access to a world of knowledge. Create a profile to receive details of our unique range of resources, events and training.
Added to basket
This paper is written to contribute to the debate on risk assessment discussed in a wider context in a paper published in the previous issue of this journal. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the author's employer. B.S. Neale
Engineers’ remuneration and status Alan Hepburn, from Birdham in Chichester; refers to his previous point (Verulam, 19 September 1995): Many thanks for publishing my letter regarding remuneration and status. However, I would like to take issue with you regarding your suggestion with respect to Fellows. This classification, exclusive or otherwise, means nothing to the general public. It is the overall status of a structural engineer which needs to be improved. Verulam
Last year, in the first of these lectures to bear his name, James himself returned to the subject of the relevance of history which Sir Alfred Pugsley and he and I introduced here in 1975. I shall not follow his example, partly because I have already presented my own further views elsewhere. R.J. Mainstone