Bursting Forces in Reinforced Concrete Columns

Author: Gohnert, M;Morris, C;Webber, K

Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Bursting Forces in Reinforced Concrete Columns

Tag
Author
Gohnert, M;Morris, C;Webber, K
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Author

Gohnert, M;Morris, C;Webber, K

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 77, Issue 23, 1999

Date published

N/A

Author

Gohnert, M;Morris, C;Webber, K

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 77, Issue 23, 1999

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Bursting forces in columns are caused by cranked vertical reinforcement. Although these bursting forces are well documented, few Codes of Practice deal with the effects
adequately. British, South African and American Codes are critically evaluated in this regard. An equation is developed to determine the amount of bursting steel required which is in the form of column ties. A finite element study and columns tests are carried out to evaluate the effects of the bursting forces and as a contribution to the design process. Recommendations are also given describing practical measures for design.

M. Gohnert, C. Morris and K. Webber

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 23/24

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Settlement cracks and cavity wall insulation Andrew Shaw, from Wakefield, W Yorks., writes: My practice investigates inter alia building movement, frequently subsidence-related. I wonder whether the pages of Verulam can be used to air a matter that somewhat perplexes me?

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Independent Assessment of Electrochemical Chloride Extraction Treatment on a 30-Year-Old Motorwa</h4>

The Independent Assessment of Electrochemical Chloride Extraction Treatment on a 30-Year-Old Motorwa

The Bann River Bridge is located on the M1 Motorway in Northern Ireland. The bridge was assessed as part of the National Assessment Programme. Localised durability problems were identified in the areas of the expansion joints, which had failed, allowing deicing salt contamination to parts of the bridge soffit and parts of the substructure. The bridge fniled the loading requirements of the National Assessment Programme, achieving 45% of the required HA loading. The preferred repair and strengthening option involved the repair of the contaminated areas. However concrete replacement repairs could not be applied economically to some of the contaminated areas owing to access problems and the extent of the contamination. Electrochemical repair techniques were therefore regarded us the only viable repair option. The Department of the Environment Roads Service (NI) decided to carry out an electrochemical chloride extraction demonstration on purt of the bridge, to ascertain the effectiveness of the technique. The University of Ulster was commissioned to provide independent assessment of the success of the treatment. During the autumn of 1997 the demonstration was carried out by Martech Services Ltd, and the range of tests performed by the team from the Universily of Ulster proved its success. J.A. Cromie, A.I. Abu-Tair and J.F. Lyness

Author – Cromie, J A;Abu-Tair, A I;Lyness, J F;McFarland, B;McCullough, W P
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Design of Steel Structures: Questioning the Code</h4>

The Design of Steel Structures: Questioning the Code

This viewpoint is written on a wholly personal basis and may not reflect the views of the trade and professional associations with which I am associated, or those of my employer. I write after a decade of concern, discussion, meetings and seminars in connection with EC 3, the proposed European Steel Structures Design Code, and with a current feeling of complete frustration and despair. Joe Locke

Author – Locke, Joe
Price – £10