A Knowledge-Based System for the Engineering Management of Subsidence Cases

CPD - what form should it take? Roger Taylor‘s letter (17 November 1998) has raised widespread comment. Chris Bailey has written: I started my own practice 2 years ago, and it now has a staff of 22. Twelve months ago I employed my first graduate and felt a high degree of responsibility for her formative years in our industry. I hoped, if not expected, that our Institution would be able to offer help and assistance to me - advice on approved training courses, an introduction to the local branch, advice to employers, etc. Sadly, this was not so; my plea for help resulted in a six-page leaflet describing the route to chartered membership, as though this should be a graduate’s only real ambition.

Well known and well-used for management purposes, spreadsheets are user friendly and exceedingly poweful. However they are not perhaps being exploited as much as they should be in structural engineering design, where they have tremendous ability to speed up design processes. C.H. Goodchild and J. Lupton

The use of computers in structural engineering started with large mainframes and was restricted to specific tasks that justified the necessary time and expense. Now, relatively cheap, powerful desktop computers are commonplace in engineering and are having a profound influence on our profession. If computers merely assisted engineers in their traditional roles and offered only stand-alone design tools, their influence would be important but not critical. However, modern developments in software and hardware offer almost limitless possibilities, and the potential for change is enormous. Add the implications of training, manpower levels and the potential for restructuring and it starts to become apparent why an understanding of engineering computing is so important and why some commentators see the digital age as having the same significance for our generation as the industrial revolution had for our forebears. P.J. Gardner