Effects of confinement on flexural strength and ductility design of HS concrete beams
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Effects of confinement on flexural strength and ductility design of HS concrete beams

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 82, Issue 23, 2004

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 82, Issue 23, 2004

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

High-strength concrete is relatively brittle and its use in a reinforced concrete member might result in unacceptably low flexural ductility. One way of improving ductility is to provide confinement. However, in the case of beam design the effects of confinement are generally not considered due mainly to the lack of a suitable design method. In order to develop a design method for improving the flexural ductility of highstrength concrete members through the provision of confinement, the effects of confinement on the flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams have been evaluated in this study by complete moment-curvature analysis of beam sections with and without confinement provided. It was found that the provision of confinement significantly increases the ultimate concrete strain, balanced steel ratio and flexural ductility.

Furthermore, design formulae for the flexural strength and ductility design of high-strength concrete beams with the effects of confinement
taken into account have been developed.

A. K. H. Kwan
F. T. K. Au
S. L. Chau
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 23/24

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Towards a more rational approach for assessing and rating concrete bridges</h4>

Towards a more rational approach for assessing and rating concrete bridges

This paper presents two new methodologies (one formal (NLFEM), the other approximate (CFPM)) which show clear differences – often quite considerable – with regard to code predictions needed to assess and rate existing concrete bridges. The work has obvious implications in terms of both economy and safety, and can assist the engineer in reaching more rational and accurate decisions on the true structural capacity and mode of failure of a structure. A. A. Mahdi, BSc, MSc, PhD, CEng, MICE Hyder Consulting, The Surrey Research Park, Guildford Prof M. D. Kotsovos, Dipl Ing, PhD, DSc, CEng Department of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Prof M. N. Pavlovic, ,BEng, MEngSc, PhD, ScD, CEng, FIStructE, FICE, FConsE Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Imperial College, London

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Notices and Proceedings</h4>