Comparison between codes of practice for designs by LRFD method

Author: Mohamed El-Shaer

Date published

31 August 2012

Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Comparison between codes of practice for designs by LRFD method

Tag
Author
Mohamed El-Shaer
Date published
31 August 2012
Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Author

Mohamed El-Shaer

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 90, Issue 9, 2012, Page(s) 40-49

Date published

31 August 2012

Author

Mohamed El-Shaer

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 90, Issue 9, 2012, Page(s) 40-49

Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

This paper compares steel column design using LRFD, evaluating the Egyptian code and international standards through finite element analysis, addressing local buckling, and proposing a reduction factor for slender sections.

Synopsis

In this paper a procedure for the comparison of steel column design by load and resistance factor design (LRFD) method, between the Egyptian code and other codes of practice, is set out. A column design curve for slender sections was established by applying a reduction factor, Q, to the LRFD column design curve. A stability analysis was conducted to study the effect of plate local buckling on flexural column buckling. A finite element model of an axially loaded I-column was developed using shell elements. Material and geometric nonlinearities were incorporated. Geometric imperfections similar to the first buckling mode with amplitude of 1/750 of column length, L, were applied. The analysis was carried out using a general purpose finite element program ANSYS. A wide range of plate width-to-thickness ratios and column slenderness ratios was studied. Column sections were grouped into three: Group 1; sections with slender unstiffened plate elements, Group 2; sections with slender stiffened plate elements, and Group 3; sections composed of slender stiffened and unstiffened elements. The buckling loads for 144 I-column configurations made of steel St.37, St.44 and St.52 were compared to respective values adopted by the AISC-LRFD and Eurocode 3 specifications.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
40-49
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Loading Issue 9

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Book review: Cable Stayed Bridges – 40 years of Experience Worldwide</h4>

Book review: Cable Stayed Bridges – 40 years of Experience Worldwide

Arup's Naeem Hussain comments on a recently published book from one of the industry's most eminent bridge designers: Professor Holger Svensson.

Date – 31 August 2012
Author – Naeem Hussain
Price – £9.95
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam (readers' letters – September 2012)</h4>

Verulam (readers' letters – September 2012)

Letters this month include discussion on embodied carbon, design software, padstones and more.

Date – 31 August 2012
Author – Various
Price – £9.95
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Shear resistance of reinforced concrete beams with pre-cast circular web openings</h4>

Shear resistance of reinforced concrete beams with pre-cast circular web openings

This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the shear behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with circular pre-cast web openings.

Date – 31 August 2012
Author – Harry Arshi, Friederike Gunzel and Kevin Stone
Price – £9.95