The built environment: sustainability from the outset

Author: Susan Mantle

Date published

2 March 2023

The built environment: sustainability from the outset
Back to Previous

The built environment: sustainability from the outset

Tag
Author
Date published
Price
Blog
Author

Susan Mantle

Date published

2 March 2023

Author

Susan Mantle

The built environment contributes significantly to the climate crisis. Susan Mantle, Technical Director at Heyne Tillett Steel, discusses five ways Structural Engineers can reduce carbon emissions - embodied carbon in particular - right from the very start of their projects.

Structural Engineers must change the collaborative process for designing a building and think about the materials they use in a different way. This begins at the very start of a potential project when the brief is being established.

Here are my thoughts on how to reshape that process to maximise reuse, circularity, and sustainability.
 

Reset the collaboration process

We know that we cannot keep demolishing our existing building stock and achieve the significant reductions in carbon and waste required of the construction industry.
There will be buildings which are genuinely at the end of their life or unsuitable for adaptation, however these should be viewed as the exceptions. The decision to demolish should only be made once the refurbishment opportunities have been investigated, as this is where big sustainability wins can be made.
If we consider an existing disused building on an urban site, the conventional approach would be to sketch out a vision for the site, which the design team ‘makes work’, either by justifying what is there for the new constraints and potentially significant alterations and enhancements, or by demolishing and starting afresh. But we should be advocating an alternative approach which optimises use of the existing asset and allows the brief to be shaped, where appropriate, around this.
The first step should be to research, model, and investigate the site and existing asset to explore what the opportunities are, and then create the brief.  
 

Research, investigate and test

This process is fundamental to getting the most out of existing structures and optimising the opportunity for retaining buildings or minimising demolition.
This may involve searching for archive information as a first step, which is possible to obtain for a remarkable array of building ages and types. This can be a real ‘game-changer’ when it can be found, as it gives a window into the original engineer or architect’s intentions, when the building was first created.
At HTS, we typically use this to create a 3D CAD model of the building. Then, investigations are carried out to verify the archive information and fill in the gaps, establishing a much more detailed picture of the existing structure.
 

Find the opportunities: use knowledge to shape the brief

The engineer can now evaluate the building and where opportunities for the architect and client can be highlighted.
Is there redundant capacity in the floors or foundations? What are the implications of adding floors, extending floorplates, infilling, or introducing lightwells? How much stability is there and how can we get the most out of the existing frame? All these, if communicated well, can inform the brief and how to undertake interventions in the most efficient way. And by working with these constraints and opportunities rather than against them, we can deliver a faster, cheaper, and significantly lower carbon building.
Alongside this, where elements of the building are to be demolished, it is worthwhile considering whether these can be deconstructed and reused instead. If any steelwork is relatively modern (post-1970s), in reasonable length sections and with simple connections, it could be ideal for reuse, either as part of the redevelopment or on another construction site through the reuse market. Carbon intensive foundations including piles can also be assessed for reuse.
Increasingly, other construction materials are being identified through pre-demolition audits and considered for reuse, but time needs to be built into the design programme to carry out this process and to be creative about the opportunities.  
 

Keep carbon and sustainability as live discussion points throughout

A client and design team can only make an educated and informed decision about options and design changes if all the data is clearly presented.
This is true of embodied carbon, and as a profession, we are becoming better at reporting carbon against design options at an early stage. There is still improvement to be made in keeping this ‘live’ throughout the design process, so that, as the design evolves, the team can see how the carbon is changing. Where it is rising, it should be identified as the changes are happening, providing the opportunity to address it in the design and reverse a negative trend. Or, if this is not possible, push to make efficiencies elsewhere to compensate.
This needs to be part of the conversation in presentations and meetings: not a small number quietly recorded in a report or drawing, but something fundamental to the design process and continually monitored and reported. 
 

Design for long life: look ahead and plan for future adaption and circularity

Finally, while designing for the lowest possible upfront embodied carbon now, we also need to remember that the most sustainable building is the one that is still being used in 100 years’ time. While considering this, we need to avoid falling into the trap of over-designing everything and beefing up the structure and embodied carbon, which we are simultaneously trying to make as lean as possible!
We can, however, make building as dismantle-able as possible, alongside looking at realistic scenarios of how the building may need to adapt for future uses, including increased height, new voids and lightwells or other changes. Where possible, these are incorporated into the design as future strengthening options rather than being an over-sizing of the base design – this can form a set of adaptions and strengthening details which sit alongside the base design ready for use in the future.  
 

Conclusion

By understanding existing structures on a site and using this knowledge to inform the way the design develops in collaboration with the wider team, we structural engineers can inform the brief and design of the building in a positive way, which reduces upfront carbon and enhances reuse, circularity and long life.

About the author

Susan Mantle Technical Director, Heyne Tillett Steel

Susan focuses in achieving the best structural solution for projects and relishes the creative nature of the design process. She has worked on a range of diverse and interesting projects, from private houses to large residential schemes, commercial buildings, museums, schools and theatres. Susan champions technical excellence across design and analysis and leads HTS+ Innovation and Research, a dedicated team who works on research projects to help resolve engineering challenges.

Related Resources & Events

Course
IStructE image 3C

Mental Health First Aid training 2024

Certify as a Mental Health First Aider through a mix of individual learning activities and four tutors led live online training sessions.

Date – 21 October 2024
Location – Online
Price – Free
Lecture
AdobeStock_126216157

James Sutherland history lecture 2024

New York's Skyscrapers: Tracing Origins and Technological Evolution

Date – 7 March 2024
Location – 47-58 Bastwick St, London, EC1V 3PS and online
Price – Free
Lecture
Used for EEFIT lecture on 14 March 2024

Earthquake loss modelling for disaster risk management

This EEFIT lecture explores the pivotal role of Earthquake Loss Models in disaster risk management, focusing the validation and calibration processes using data from past events and field missions.

Date – 14 March 2024
Location – Online
Price – Free