Making your steel specification more sustainable
Date published

30 March 2021

Back to Previous

Making your steel specification more sustainable

Date published

30 March 2021



In the form of embodied carbon, steel is a significant contributor to the climate crisis. This guidance sets out how structural engineers can use their steel specifications to help move the industry towards net zero.

This guidance sets out how structural engineers can use steel specifications to help move the industry towards net zero by 2050. It applies to building projects where the National Structural Steel Specification (7th edition) is used.

When developing a project specification, the engineer should engage with the client and wider design team to ensure that there is full alignment on the project’s sustainability goals.

They should keep in mind that there may be cost, time or logistical implications. This alignment needs to encompass the full supply chain, so should be clearly communicated in the pre-tender qualification process.

Part one: specification additions and modifications

Carbon transparency

It’s important to ask for Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) to EN 15804 for all steel products. This will help drive adoption of EPD and ultimately help designers make more informed decisions.
Modules A1-A3 have the biggest impact on reaching net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions targets by 2050. Module D impact figures are welcome but will usually be beyond the scope of our project influence. They are likely to have little or no impact on net emissions up to 2050.
Scrap steel is currently turned into new steel products, mainly through EAF mills. This route emits less GHG than steel made from iron ore so it is tempting to specify this on our projects. It may be necessary to specify recycled content limits to comply with Green Rating scheme credits.

This in turn may have cost implications without necessarily resulting in net carbon reduction for the industry. Scrap is a limited resource and to reduce GHG globally we need to achieve reductions in emissions from all steel-making processes.  

The recently published SteelZero commitment gives a more balanced definition of low embodied carbon steel and one which incentivises industry-wide GHG reductions over the next decade. Specification can set targets for the proportion of project steel meeting this definition. Example specification wording is shown below.

‘A minimum of [50%] by mass of the structural steel used on the project shall be from steel products that meet one or more of the following criteria:
  • ResponsibleSteelTM Certified Steel, or steel meeting an equivalent international standard
  • Steel produced by a steelmaking site where the site’s corporate owner has defined and made public both a long-term emissions reduction pathway and a medium-term, quantitative science-based GHG emissions target for the corporation that has been approved by the SBTi or by SteelZeroo
  • Low Embodied Carbon Steel as defined by SteelZero or a steel product supplied with a certified EPD Module A1-A3 Global Warming impact (kgCO2 eq./tonne) not exceeding (1400 - 1200mSM), where mSM is the proportion by mass of secondary material in the feedstock'
Future reuse and design for deconstruction

Making provision for future adaptability or reuse is a positive (for example considering reversibility of beam-to-slab connections). But you should avoid adding significant steel weight in the form of lower utilisations or complicated connections to facilitate this.

You should insist on comprehensive traceability and as-built O&M/Safety File records. Unless required by the Project Specification, the NSSS currently requests partial traceability. With an IFC model, including connection-design information, this will be useful for future flexibility and deconstruction and reuse.

The best means of achieving this should be agreed with your fabricator but the intended output is that the following should be easily accessible for each element (NSSS 4.1.1):
  • Section size
  • Grade
  • Sub-grade
  • Mill certificates
  • Welding certificates
  • EPD
  • Connection
Completed components can be marked with section size, and steel grade as well as an erection mark. This can help with checking and re-design post-construction during refurbishment and at end of life.

Only the erection mark is required under NSSS (4.1.3). These marks will be obscured by intumescent paint and will likely not provide sufficient information for salvage in the absence of the O&M information noted in the suggestion above.

It can also help to set out the process or workflow under which salvaged steel will be accepted. For example, members governed by serviceability requirements could be identified as judicious candidates for salvaged steel. Refer to SCI P427.  
Quality Assurance Systems
You can consider adding a requirement for sustainable procurement (BES 6001/ ISO 14001). This will provide evidence that there is a management system in place to responsibly source materials from the supply chain.
Also consider making membership of the BCSA sustainability charter (Gold or Silver) mandatory. This is optional in NSSS (11.1.2). This covers a range of sustainability measures, not merely environmental.
Temporary Works

Avoid making temporary steelwork permanent, especially where construction cases dominate permanent design cases. Examples might include angle sections running parallel to metal deck spans along core walls or temporary torsional stiffening for beams supporting precast units.

You will need to discuss this with your client and contractor pre-tender and explicitly set this out in your specification information. This is because it may be quicker and cheaper to increase steel weight and reduce temporary works operations on-site.
Connection Specification

Don’t over-rationalise element sizes and connection forces. The fabricator can rationalise at a later stage, with the engineer’s agreement, if necessary.

Don’t specify full-penetration butt welds if fillet welds or partial penetration butt welds are adequate. If possible, design for robustness forces in structural topping rather than specifying as a force for the connection design.

Finally, specify standard connections (Green Book, where feasible) to improve future flexibility.

This will usually be led by the architect, however we can contribute by:
  • Minimising paint to internal, non-visual areas
  • Using boarded fire protection rather than painted. It will be easier to demount in the future and allows steel to be reused more easily

Part 2: design

The most significant impact designers can make is to reduce the quantity of steel specified. Some initial suggestions are set out below.

Topology Optimisation: use optimal spans & grids, and proportion steel sections so that strength governs, where possible.

Element Optimisation: reduce rationalisation and aim for high utilisation factors. Consider use of fabricated sections, including with varying cross-section properties rather than standard rolled sections, where significant tonnage savings can be achieved. Consider digital optimisation.

Review conservative default assumptions baked into analysis software: carefully consider element releases to avoid excessive material & fabrication in connections.

Consider using higher grade (S460) steel: this is explicitly allowed for in NSSS 7th Edition.

Review opportunities to minimise loading: the self-weight of flooring supported on a steel grid will have a significant impact on the tonnage and thus the carbon impact.


Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
Steel beam, timber plank, masonry brick, concrete block

Making low-carbon material choices

Will Arnold, Jenny Burridge, David Moore, Keerthi Ranasinghe and Sean Wilkins argue that engineers should always look to specify the most suitable material for a particular project, and offer advice on how to use materials efficiently once a choice is made.

Date ‐ 1 February 2021
Author ‐ Will Arnold, Jenny Burridge, David Moore, Keerthi Ranasinghe and Sean Wilkins
Price ‐ £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Industry CPD: Structural steel and the circular economy</h4>

Industry CPD: Structural steel and the circular economy

This CPD module, sponsored by Steel for Life, examines a number of steel’s credentials specifically on its ability to be reused, recycled and multi-cycled, its structural efficiency as a construction material, and its alignment and application to circular economy principles.

Date ‐ 25 February 2021
Author ‐ Steel for Life
Price ‐ £0
A steel and concrete structure

Steel, concrete and climate change

Muiris Moynihan MIStructE explains why use is so widespread, the materials' climate change impact, and why their responsible use is the realm of structural engineers.

Date ‐ 11 December 2019
Author ‐ Muiris Moynihan MIStructE