Presidential Address Progressive Collapse Revisited (the Problem of Structural Behaviour)
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Presidential Address Progressive Collapse Revisited (the Problem of Structural Behaviour)

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 59, Issue 12, 1981

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 59, Issue 12, 1981

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Aims of our Institution
My Address coincides, in point of time, with the start of a new phase in engineering-the introduction of the Engineering Council. This Government-sponsored body is expected, in due course, with the agreement of CEI, to take over the granting of the title of ‘chartered engineer’. The Engineering Council will promote and develop the
knowledge and best practice of engineering. Since we, in this Institution, have affirmed that our aim is ‘to promote the general advancement of the science
and art of structural engineering’ then there can be no conflict in our respective aims. It is as well, however, to recall that whatever happens elsewhere, we have the sole right to qualify chartered structural engineers. Indeed, it appears to me important that in our pursuit of excellence in engineering, our members understand that we intend to continue to discharge this function with our accustomed vigour and energy. There is no doubt that our standards, as has been said before, are higher than those envisaged in the Finniston Report. We do not intend to lower those standards.

T.N.W. Akroyd

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 12

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Christmas test For students this is the time of year for Christmas assessments and, for qualified engineers, the time for riddles from Christmas crackers. Here is an assessment for you all! Please note the time allowed and check your answers. Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Simple Codes can Stifle Structural Technology</h4>

Simple Codes can Stifle Structural Technology

The role of Codes as an aid in achieving good construction is much in dispute. Should they be somewhere between recent research and standardised proven requirements, telling engineers what is good practice, or should they be precise documents that set out how the task should be handled? Assuming that such precision is even possible, is it in fact desirable, or will innovation and flair be stifled? Are they a guide to the knowledgeable or a safety net for the amateur? If precise in their demands, should such Codes be the means of meeting statutory requirements? J.G. Sunley and R.G. Taylor

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Rules of Conduct Guidance Note No. 4 Surveys of Residential Property</h4>

Rules of Conduct Guidance Note No. 4 Surveys of Residential Property

When a house or some other form of property changes hands, the buyer usually commissions a survey of it; or, if a mortgage is negotiated, the Building Society will give instructions for a surveyor to establish value. Whoever undertakes a survey is legally responsible for what is said in the report to the client.

Price – £10