Factors Affecting the Rotation Capacity of Plastically Designed Members
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

Added to basket

Back to Previous

Factors Affecting the Rotation Capacity of Plastically Designed Members

The Structural Engineer
Factors Affecting the Rotation Capacity of Plastically Designed Members
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

A simple diagonal stiffener is proposed as a solution to premature local flange and web buckling of plastically designed members in pitched-roof portals and continuous beams. This solution is developed from theoretical predictions and experimental results, which also show that existing Codes do not allow for certain effects which significantly reduce the rotation capacity of members under moment gradient, particularly the influences of span and coincident axial force. A new model is proposed for the interaction between local flange, local web, and lateral-torsional buckling of plastically designed members, which compares favourably with earlier test results. The stiffener arrangement approximately doubled the rotation capacity in five pairs of stiffened and unstiffened test specimens in which the critical modes were local flange or web buckling. Professor A.R. Kemp

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 2

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
Conservation and Structure - the Roof to the Great Hall, Bedford School

Conservation and Structure - the Roof to the Great Hall, Bedford School

The paper makes some observations and suggestions about developing an approach to conservation that includes the consideration of a building’s anatomy and structure. It describes the reconstruction of the Great Hall roof of Bedford School as an example of this approach. D. Sugden and C. Wymer

Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
Verulam

Verulam

The headache ball conundrum Professor Sir Alan Harris asked us in November to look at a paradox and examine our use of strain energy methods in structural analysis. His question concerned where the increase in potential energy comes from when a system consisting of a weight suspended by chain from an immovable support undergoes a reduction in temperature which raises the weight and reduces the thermal energy stored in the system. The response of our readers has been generous and varied. The first letter was from Mr L. Wadsworth of Worcester: I think that the answer is to be found by examining more closely the specification that the support for the suspension chain must be ‘immovable’. Nothing is immovable. If a practical, buildable system is considered it is immediately obvious that the change in temperature will affect the supports as well as the chain and ball. The legs of the supports will be longer than the chain (they must be to keep the ball off the ground!) and so they will shorten more than the chain. Thus, although the ball moves up relative to the suspension point, it will have a net downward movement relative to the ground, thereby preserving the theory of the conservation of energy. Verulam

Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
Colloquium: Refurbishment and Renovation. Renovation and Restoration of Historic Buildings in Widema

Colloquium: Refurbishment and Renovation. Renovation and Restoration of Historic Buildings in Widema

The paper describes the renovation and reconstruction of listed buildings in an hirstoric city-their planning, temporary works, design, and construction. R.O.C. Seaman

Price - £9