Innovation V. Quality Assurance
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Innovation V. Quality Assurance

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 65, Issue 1, 1987

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 65, Issue 1, 1987

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Most structural engineers enjoy a challenge, particularly when they can produce a unique or innovatory solution to that challenge. Successful innovation is beneficial for the engineers involved and for other engineers who can observe and learn from that application. In that way, the frontiers of knowledge are advanced and the successful innovations become proven practice within the parameters of the experience gained. For the engineer introducing the innovation, there are several aspects:
-is the engineer aware that a change is being made from previous practice?
-have the implications of the change or innovation been considered?
-is there sufficient data to substantiate the change or innovation?
-is a development programme needed to support the proposals?
-is there a course of action which can be adopted in the event that the change or innovation does not give the specified service to the client?
-is the engineer likely to be held responsible for additional costs because of unsatisfactory performance resulting from the change or innovation?

D.W. Quinion

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 1

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Tensile stresses in concrete Several of our readers have commented on the reservations expressed by Mr V. T. Pannell, which we supported, regarding the ability of concrete to resist tensile stress; these appeared last July and were discussed further in October, when Mr R. 0. C. Seaman wrote to us. We have now heard further from Mr Seaman: Further to my previous letter and the reservations expressed about the application of concrete in tension, I would quote in further support of my contention, Table 11 of Civil Engineering Code of Practice no. 2: Earth retaining structures, which gives recommended permissible tensile stresses for mass concrete in flexure of 40 lb/in2 (0.3 N/mm2) for a 1:2:4 mix.

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Pursuit and Appreciation of Excellence</h4>

The Pursuit and Appreciation of Excellence

The Western Counties Branch was privileged to receive the President and Secretary of the Institution at the inaugural meeting on 10 October 1986. Professor Happold’s address was full of interest and, at the end, he turned the tables on the Branch by setting certain questions. The first was to ask for suggestions on how our standing in society could be improved, i.e. how to improve public appreciation of structural engineers; another, what we would like to see in The Structural Engineer. The two questions are closely related to two other matters of considerable importance to us all, i.e. CPD and closer working relationships. D.R. Wardle

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>The Design and Construction of the Diplomatic Club, Riyadh</h4>

The Design and Construction of the Diplomatic Club, Riyadh

The paper describes i he eva rluation of engineering design, design management, and construction, of the Diplomatic Club, a new building of floor area 24 000 m2, in Riyadh. Professor E. Happold, T.A. Ealy, J.W.E. Pugh and R.H. Webster

Price – £10