A Retrospect of a Scottish Experience
Date published

N/A

First published: N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

Added to basket

Back to Previous

A Retrospect of a Scottish Experience


The Structural Engineer
A Retrospect of a Scottish Experience
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

First published

N/A

Buy Now

I was surprised and a little awestruck when the Scottish Branch requested me to write on the above theme. However, the Branch conjures up so many happy and fulfilling memories that the request could not be gainsaid. W.G.N. Geddes

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Feature Issue 5

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
Building in Scotland

Building in Scotland

For those unfamiliar with building in Scotland, important factors to be considered are - basic wind speed - rain - freezing conditions and the combined effect of these on buildings and materials. J.R. Scott

Author - Scott, J R
Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
The Forth Bridge

The Forth Bridge

Crossing the Firth of Forth Over the centuries, the river has been crisscrossed by ferries. With the prevailing winds and high seas experienced on the Firth, these were often rather hazardous crossings. However, in the 18th and 19th centuries the alternative was a long, circuitous coach trip via Linlithgow and Stirling and back again along the north shore of the river. D.G. McBeth

Author - McBeth, D G
Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
Scottish Law; Settling Contractual Disputes; Quality Assurance

Scottish Law; Settling Contractual Disputes; Quality Assurance

It is said that the legal systems of Scotland and England arrive broadly at the same answer, but by different routes. There is always truth in a generalisation, but there are particular areas of concern to the consulting engineer, i.e. prescription and duty of care. J.A. Welsh In most construction contracts when claims arise, the engineer (or architect) is required to judge fairly between the rights of the Quality employer and those of the contractor. There are several obstacles to this process. Firstly, assurance the Resident Engineer may have a different version of events from those put forward by the contractor, and the engineer, not unnaturally, may favour his employee’s account. Secondly, the claim may be based on deficiencies in the engineer’s site investigation, specification, or drawings, or on their late delivery, and an engineer would need to be superhuman to be completely impartial in making his decision. Thirdly, the cost or programme consequences of a decision in favour of the contractor may be unpalatable to the employer, and knowledge of this could be difficult for the engineer to put from his mind. Fourthly, the employer may feel, and express the view, that he is paying the engineer to defend him against the contractor. R.P.M. Gardner In January 1988, I wrote an article for Structural news, which was a personal view of the role that quality assurance could play in the day-to-day regulation of the work of consulting engineers. A.N. Tait

Price - £9