Author: Jeary, A P
First published: N/A
Standard: £9 + VAT
An IStructE account gives you access to a world of knowledge. Create a profile to receive details of our unique range of resources, events and training.
Added to basket
Jeary, A P
I am not sure whether I saw a particular reference in the paper to a question I should like to ask. We are talking about a system of construction that is of comparatively modem origin. How has the design of adhesives used in gluedlaminated construction kept pace with the growth of the magnitude of the structures that are now possible? Or is that particularly relevant?
This feature is a summary of ideas about preparation for the Part 3 examination. The examination is noted for its difficulty and high failure-rate. Having failed in 1989, I
thought it through and passed in 1990. This is written in the hope that it will prove useful to those preparing for it.
‘Quality Assurance’ - benefits for the consultant?
Robert De’Ath, of Forest Row, Sussex, has raised afresh the question of to what extent the formal pursuit of ‘QA ’ is capable of bringing tangible advantages to consulting civil and structural engineers:
As the partner responsible for making the ‘QA’ preparations for our practice, I would welcome all the constructive advice fellow members are able to offer. So far I have familiarised myself with the general principles of what ‘QA’ involves, and my first impression is that it involves formal systems and records covering those usual activities which have always been part and parcel of my working life, in whatever practice or design office I have been working. Therefore, I am searching to discover what are the real benefits to ourselves, for embarking on ‘QA’, and what are the real benefits to our clients? I am reliably informed ‘QA’ saves contractors’ money. Does it do the same for consultants?