N/A
Standard: £10 + VATMembers/Subscribers: Free
Members/Subscribers, log in to access
The Structural Engineer, Volume 72, Issue 22, 1994
In my recent article ‘Problems of working without a contract’ (16 August ,1994) I outlined some of the ways in which an engineer might get paid even where he has no contract with whoever has instructed him. I considered two situations: -Where a client asks for a preliminary appraisal ‘to be provided within 7 days’ and the engineer says he may or may not be able to comply with this timetable (although in fact does), no fees are discussed and the client then refuses to pay. Generally the engineer can recover a reasonable sum for work done (on a quantum meruit valued on an objective basis). - Where an engineer is invited to tender, and does so, but for some reason the client fails to consider his tender, although he considers others. Traditionally the engineer here has no remedy, but it was noted that recent case law suggests otherwise, particularly where the client is a public body and has failed to consider the tender at all (as opposed to considering it inadequately). Ian R. Yule
The engineering challenge Engineering brings together people, ideas and things to create something new and useful for society. The challenge is to manage these three facets dynamically to achieve a satisfying synergy. This is particularly true for the construction industry, where the products often have a major impact on the landscape (urban or rural) and are around for a long time. M.R. Starr
CIC work I represent the Institution on the Health and Safety Steering Committee of the Construction Industry Council. The Committee, which is chaired by Professor Donald Bishop also includes representatives from ICE, RIBA, ACE, CIOB, RICS, Architects and Surveyors Institute, the Landscape Institute and HSE. Its attention has been focused on two major issues. M.J. Stokes