project: water cube
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

project: water cube

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 84, Issue 3, 2006

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 84, Issue 3, 2006

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Issue 3

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>viewpoint: macleod</h4>

viewpoint: macleod

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Some problems with arch bridge assessment and potential solutions</h4>

Some problems with arch bridge assessment and potential solutions

• Arches with low dead load, and therefore low prestress may be susceptible to traffic damage under loads currently applied. • Using current assessment rules these bridges appear to be safe. • Using a distribution model which is more in line with anticipated behaviour is capable of yielding results which allow an engineer to differentiate effectively between bridges which are safe and those which may be in danger. • A true representation of behaviour is not yet possible and may never be. • It is a matter of some urgency that the potential for over estimation of capacity is acknowledged and research put in hand to investi gate the causes thoroughly and test the models proposed here. • In the meantime, it is unsafe, and therefore inadmissible to suggest that the current model should be used until a better one is proved. It would be better to give no guidance at all, and allow individual engineers to make their own judgments than to continue to offer guidance which is known to be, at best, flawed. Bill Harvey, BSc PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE Director, Bill Harvey Associates Ltd, Exeter

Author – Harvey, Bill
Price – £10