Cold-formed steel portal frames in fire: full-scale testing and finite element analysis

Author: Ross Johnston, James Lim, Hieng Lau, Yifan Xu, Mohammed Sonebi, Charles Armstrong, Christopher Switzer and Chee Mei

Date published

1 October 2014

Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Cold-formed steel portal frames in fire: full-scale testing and finite element analysis

Tag
Author
Ross Johnston, James Lim, Hieng Lau, Yifan Xu, Mohammed Sonebi, Charles Armstrong, Christopher Switzer and Chee Mei
Date published
1 October 2014
Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Author

Ross Johnston, James Lim, Hieng Lau, Yifan Xu, Mohammed Sonebi, Charles Armstrong, Christopher Switzer and Chee Mei

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 92, Issue 10, 2014, Page(s) 44-50

Date published

1 October 2014

Author

Ross Johnston, James Lim, Hieng Lau, Yifan Xu, Mohammed Sonebi, Charles Armstrong, Christopher Switzer and Chee Mei

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 92, Issue 10, 2014, Page(s) 44-50

Price

Standard: £9.95 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Cold-formed steel portal frames can be a viable alternative to conventional hot-rolled steel portal frames for light industrial, sports and agricultural buildings. This article describes a full-scale, natural fire test on a cold-formed steel portal frame building.

Synopsis

A full-scale, non-uniform natural fire test on a cold-formed steel portal frame building is described. The results of the fire test are used to validate a non-linear, elasto-plastic, finite element shell idealisation, for the purposes of later forming the basis of a performance-based design approach for cold-formed steel portal frames at elevated temperatures. The test building had a span of 8m, height-to-eaves of 2.2m, length of 10m, with a frame spacing of 2.5m. The member and connections of the frame were constructed entirely from cold formed steel and the eaves and apex joints were classified as semi-rigid. In order to reduce the influence of diaphragm action, the cladding was detailed to act independently from the frames. The frame collapsed with an eventual inwards asymmetrical collapse mechanism at 714°C, with collapse being due to member buckling rather than failure of the screws or joints. The collapse temperature predicted using the shell idealisation was 682°C, with a deformed shape similar to that observed in the fire test.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
44-50
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Metal - steel Fire Issue 10

Related Resources & Events

Course
Temporary bracing of steel frame

Steel essentials: practical design of structural steelwork

This one day, online course presents practical guidance on key aspects of preliminary scheme development and detailed scheme design in structural steelwork.

Date – 5 October 2026
Location – Online
Price – £315 - £465 + VAT
Training
IDEA StatiCa

​​Fire design principles for structural engineers​

Engineers must be clear on their responsibilities regarding the performance of the structure in fire.

Date – 20 February 2026
Author – Various
Price – £88.40 - £340 + VAT
Guidance
Modular steel structure

The performance in fire of volumetric modular steel framed construction

This article provides a high-level overview of key fire safety aspects that can affect the safety and structural integrity of steel frame volumetrically designed buildings.

Date – 17 June 2025
Author – Mostafa Jafarian, Mark O'Connor, Tom Lennon, Jose Cullen Torero
Price – Free