The Structural Engineer > Archive > Volume 94 (2016) > Issue 1 > Verulam (readers' letters - January 2016)
Name of File Verulam.pdf cached at 18/12/2017 09:09:48 - with 2 pages. pdfPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\f1\f178a9e7-2ce2-422c-a46a-b4bb7b9a34b4.pdf. thumbPath: E:\k9.istructe.org\CMS\webtest\files\pdfthumbs\f178a9e7-2ce2-422c-a46a-b4bb7b9a34b4_1.png. objDoc: 1 - True. objPreview.Log: . strFileName: f178a9e7-2ce2-422c-a46a-b4bb7b9a34b4_1.png

Members/subscribers must be logged in to view this article

Verulam (readers' letters - January 2016)

Letters this month raise concerns about the the forces cited in an article published in May 2015 on assessing the capacity of the Grand Parade stone balustrade in Bath, UK; as well as considering structural safety margins and code discrepancies in relation to steel web buckling.

Author(s): Various