Back to Previous

Beyond Portland cement: Low-carbon alternatives

This guidance, authored by Eugenie Sentucq and Max Clayton, details how the amount of embodied carbon in concrete can be reduced though the use of alternatives to cement. Max runs a design team at Structure Workshop and together with Eugenie, they have been instrumental in developing the company's low-carbon approach.

Portland cement production is already responsible for over 8% of global carbon emissions1, yet its production is set to increase by 25% by 20501  - a period in which rapid global decarbonisation is urgently required.

Current methods of reducing the amount of embodied carbon in concrete – replacing cement with slag and fly ash – are inadequate due to their small and declining supply, but there are promising alternatives that can be developed and used to meet these challenges.
 



Clinker substitution (the problem with GGBS and PFA)

An effective way of reducing the carbon associated with concrete construction is to replace a substantial portion of clinker in the cement mix with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). Today these are primarily ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) or pulverised fly ash (PFA).

PFA and GGBS are both industrial waste products, so their use in cement reduces the carbon emissions from clinker production. Their effect on concrete is well understood, with high strength and durable mixes being readily available.

The problem with GGBS and PFA is one of supply. The amount of slag available globally is only 5-10% of cement production2, with a similar figure for PFA. As by-products of high-carbon industries, their availability will decrease further as coal power stations are shut down and more steel is recycled over the coming years.

Almost all of the GGBS and PFA currently produced in the UK is already being used, primarily in concrete, so specifying these SCMs does not necessarily help to reduce construction sector emissions. In addition, most slag production is localised to a few iron-producing countries, whereas cement demand is far more pervasive. To meet the massive demand for cement globally, new SCMs are needed which are both abundant and widespread.
 

Alternative SCMs

Cementitious materials are broadly made up of calcium, silicon, and aluminium oxides in various proportions. Unlike calcium, natural sources of silicon and aluminium are not present as carbonates, and therefore do not undergo decarbonation when calcined for cement.

One plentiful and readily available raw material is clay. Clays with a high kaolinite content, rich in silica and alumina, have been shown to be highly pozzolanic if calcined at 700-850°C2. They exist worldwide in massive quantities, so vast as to be effectively unlimited1. Another abundant SCM is limestone, which can be ground for use at modest ratios in cement in its uncalcined state.
 



Limestone calcined clay cements (LC3)

A combination of calcined clay and limestone can directly replace a high proportion of Portland clinker in cement. This is known as Limestone Calcined Clay Cement, or LC3.

In European standards, ternary blends such as CEM IIB-M(Q-LL) already allow for a clinker content of just 65%, with calcined clays (Q) and limestone (LL) making up the rest. There is a proposed extension to the standard that will allow clinker content to be reduced to 50%, but this does not currently include calcined clay as an approved substitute.  

A blend comprising just 50% clinker with 30% calcined clay, 15% limestone and 5% gypsum has been shown to produce cement with mechanical properties comparable to a CEM I blend from seven days, with better durability and with a 30% reduction in CO2 emissions4.  This technology has already been successfully trialled in in Cuba and India, including a concrete demonstration house in Jhansi, India which resulted in a 15.5t carbon saving5.  It should be straightforward to include calcined clays in higher quantities in future technical standards.  
 



The commercial availability of calcined clays is currently limited compared to the sheer quantity needed, as the cement industry is currently geared towards Portland cement production, but the raw materials are sufficiently abundant. Calcined clay limestone cements have the potential to dramatically expand the use of SCMs as partial clinker replacement and make significant contributions to CO2 emission reduction.
 

Alkali-activated materials / geopolymers

In the long term, alternative cementitious materials have the potential to replace up to 100% of Portland clinker, GGBS and PFA in cement mixes. Some raw materials high in alumina and silica include volcanic rocks (common in southern Europe, the Andes and the Middle East), lateritic soils (common in the tropics) and clays high in kaolin (common worldwide). These raw materials are widely distributed and exist in quantities vastly exceeding global cement production6.  

They can be heated and crushed to form a powdered precursor for use in cement. The resulting product is known as an alkali-activated material, or a geopolymer when minerals lacking calcium are used. When combined with a strong alkali ‘activator’, the precursor reacts to form a hardened binder. In the case of geopolymers, this binder consists of aluminosilicate phases, rather than calcium hydrates present in Portland cement, but with similar properties. This technology may play a critical role in achieving the emissions reductions required of the construction industry.

Various commercial alkali-activated cements have already been developed, such as DB Group’s Cemfree and Cemex’s Vertua which are available in the UK today, but both are reliant on GGBS as the precursor. In Northern Ireland, Banah UK Ltd developed a geopolymer cement based on calcined clay, and claimed a 75% reduction in carbon emissions, but the company shut down in 2019 for commercial reasons.

Commercially available, low-calcium geopolymer cements based on natural resources have the potential to dramatically reduce global concrete emissions, but they are still a nascent technology with significant R&D required to create a viable product.
 

Summary

Reducing construction industry emissions by the extent necessary to limit warming to 1.5°C will require a huge increase in the use of alternative cements and a shift away from Portland clinker, GGBS and fly ash, in addition to lowering the overall demand for cement where possible. While these new materials currently have a limited production capacity compared to the vast quantities required, it is important we educate ourselves and be prepared to incorporate these alternative cements into our designs as they become available. Engineers can help create a market for, and build acceptance of, these alternative cement products. The future of the cement industry could conceivably involve the development of a wide range of cements based on locally available, highly abundant, low carbon natural resources, with massive reductions in embodied carbon as a result.


References

1 Karen L. Scrivener, Vanderley M. John, Ellis M. Gartner (2018) 'Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry', UN Environment
2 Karen Scrivener, Fernando Martirena, Shashank Bishnoi, Soumen Maity (2018) 'Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3)', Cement and Concrete Research, 114, pp49-56
3 Jannie S. J. van Deventer, Claire E. White, Rupert J. Myers (2020) 'A Roadmap for Production of Cement and Concrete with Low‑CO2 Emissions', Waste and Biomass Valorization (2020)
4 Maria C.G. Juenger, Ruben Snellings, Susan A. Bernal (2019) 'Supplementary cementitious materials: New sources, characterization, and performance insights', Cement and Concrete Research, 122, pp257-273
5 LC3 in use: Applications
6 John L. Provis (2018) 'Alkali-activated materials', Cement and Concrete Research, 114, pp40-48

 



 

Related Resources & Events

Course
concrete structure with light intruding through holes

Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures (Online)

This course introduces participants to the design of concrete structures to Eurocode 2, including the basics (materials, cover, fire), flexure, shear, deflection and column design.

Date ‐ 1 December 2021
Price ‐ £255 - £395
Webinar
<h4>Novel materials series: Key considerations for design and build of FRP road bridges</h4>

Novel materials series: Key considerations for design and build of FRP road bridges

Novel materials and methods to achieve net zero: part 5 of 6.

Date ‐ 20 October 2021
Price ‐ From £45.50 + VAT
Conference
<h4>Climate emergency conference 2021</h4>

Climate emergency conference 2021

Understand how engineers can and are shaping the future of climate change.

Date ‐ 29 September 2021
Price ‐ Free
Conference
<h4>Annual Academics Conference (online)</h4>

Annual Academics Conference (online)

Two half days of online presentations and discussion groups for the built environment academic community.

Date ‐ 15 September 2021
Price ‐ Free
Webinar
<h4>Novel materials series: Low carbon concrete technology</h4>

Novel materials series: Low carbon concrete technology

Novel materials and methods to achieve net zero: part 4 of 6.

Date ‐ 9 September 2021
Price ‐ From £45.50 + VAT
Webinar
<h4>Webinar series: Novel materials and methods to achieve net zero</h4>

Webinar series: Novel materials and methods to achieve net zero

Purchase the full series and gain access to all six live and on-demand webinars.

Date ‐ 9 September 2021
Price ‐ From £234.00 + VAT
Guidance
<h4>Design for zero</h4>

Design for zero

Pre-order now. This guide explains why overdesign is so prevalent, its impact on material consumption and CO 2 emissions, and provides five key actions you can take now, to reduce the carbon your projects produce.

Date ‐ 27 August 2021
Author ‐ John Orr, Tim Ibell, Claire Smith & Margaret Cooke
Price ‐ £22.50/£29.25/£45
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Deriving embodied carbon factors from scratch</h4>

Deriving embodied carbon factors from scratch

James Kitchin describes an approach to calculating embodied carbon coefficients for materials when an environmental product declaration is not available.

Date ‐ 5 July 2021
Author ‐ James Kitchin
Price ‐ £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>A short guide to carbon offsetting</h4>

A short guide to carbon offsetting

Offsetting greenhouse gas emissions will be required in the short term while the construction industry develops zero-carbon materials. Will Arnold summarises the key considerations for engineers looking to offset a project’s emissions.

Date ‐ 5 July 2021
Author ‐ Will Arnold
Price ‐ £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>RICA – climate-positive design using locally sourced materials</h4>

RICA – climate-positive design using locally sourced materials

This article describes the climate-positive design for the campus of the Rwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture.

Date ‐ 5 July 2021
Author ‐ James Kitchin, Rosie Goldrick and Kelly Alvarez Doran
Price ‐ £9
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Technical Guidance Note (Level 3, No. 3): Application of design methods of post-fixed anchors in c</h4>

Technical Guidance Note (Level 3, No. 3): Application of design methods of post-fixed anchors in c

This Technical Guidance Note introduces the analysis and design methods for post-fixed anchors and explains how they can be applied.

Date ‐ 5 July 2021
Author ‐ Chris O'Regan
Price ‐ £9
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Viewpoint: Racing to zero: isn't it time you committed to emission reduction targets</h4>

Viewpoint: Racing to zero: isn't it time you committed to emission reduction targets

Buro Happold and WSP UK have committed to reducing the carbon emissions of their designs by 50% by 2030. In this article, Sarah Prichard and David Leversha set out the rationale for this target, explain how they plan to achieve this, and encourage other firms to join them in setting an ambitious agenda for governments to follow as we approach the COP26 climate summit.

Date ‐ 5 July 2021
Author ‐ Sarah Prichard and David Leversha
Price ‐ £0
Case Study
Blue abstract blocks

John Barrett Prize 2020: a sustainable habitat for coastal communities

The 2020 prize-winning team present their response to the competition brief.

Date ‐ 29 June 2021
Author ‐ Gian Karlo Cabanas, Suista Gurung, Shalini Jagnarine-Azan, Tom Newby
Price ‐ Free
Blog
Blue abstract blocks

Addressing the Climate Emergency within a small engineering practice

In this blog, Matt Byatt FIStrucE and Vice President, describe his SME's experience in addressing the Climate Emergency.

Date ‐ 21 June 2021
Author ‐ Matt Byatt
Price ‐ Free
Training
Blue abstract blocks

fib: What's happening? 2021

This annual update provides an overview of the ongoing work from two fib commissions.

Date ‐ 10 June 2021
Author ‐ Jenny Burridge, Frank Dehn, Andy Truby
Price ‐ Free