6 September 2019
Thermal mass is a term that describes the ability of a material to store heat. To be useful in the built environment they must also be able to absorb and release heat - at a rate roughly in step with a building’s daily heating and cooling cycle.
Concrete and masonry products do this well and, being dense materials, can also store a lot of heat. Timber absorbs heat too slowly to offer much effective thermal mass, and steel conducts heat too rapidly to be in synch with a building’s natural heat flows over the day.
Thermal mass in summer
On warm summer days, walls and floors with thermal mass will steadily absorb heat at their surface, conducting it inwardly, and storing it until exposed to the cooler air of the evening/night. At this point, heat will begin to migrate back to the surface and be released. In this way, heat moves in a wave-like motion alternately being absorbed and released in response to the change in day and night-time conditions.
This ability to respond naturally to changing conditions helps stabilise the internal temperature and provides a largely self-regulating environment, reducing the risk of overheating and the need for mechanical cooling.
Thermal mass in winter
Thermal mass can reduce the energy needed to keep a heavyweight building warm during the heating season. This works through the ability of thermal mass to capture and recycle heat gains from south facing windows, along with those produced by lighting, people and appliances.
As the temperature drops overnight, this is slowly released back into the building, helping keep it warm and reducing the need for supplementary heating. Whilst lightweight buildings are also capable of doing this, the extent to which the heat gains can be utilised increases with the level of thermal mass; something that is now recognised in SAP - which is compliance tool for Part L1A of the Building Regulations dealing with new dwellings.
Does thermal mass have any disadvantages?
In summer, thermal mass is only beneficial if nighttime ventilation (or some other means) can be used to cool it down. Local issues such as pollution and security concerns can sometimes make this impracticable, although there are often ways to overcome these problems.
In winter, older heavyweight buildings with comparatively low levels of insulation and poor airtightness often required a relatively long pre-heat period to warm up the fabric, resulting in slightly more fuel being used than in a similar lightweight building. However, the greatly improved standard of fabric performance in new build means this is no longer the problem it once was, as the fabric retains much more of its warmth during periods when the heating is off. In practice, the ability of thermal mass to reduce the cooling load in many building types, particularly offices, is far more significant than the preheat issue.
In some types of intermittently occupied buildings, for example a weekend holiday cottage, thermally lightweight construction may still be the best option where heating is concerned, as it will enable a more rapid warm up period. For new mainstream housing, the preheat issue is negligible, and increasing the standard of insulation and airtightness ensures the passive benefits of thermal mass during the heating season are of more significance.
Impact / opportunities for structural engineers
Choice of structural system may be influenced by the thermal mass requirements by others. Typically surface specification finishes for exposed surfaces is developed by the architect but this may impact on concrete mix design and hence the structural engineer must have input.
This article details the main policy measures affecting the sustainability of structural engineering designs, both in the UK and abroad.
The Institution's report on rating schemes for the sustainability assessment of structures.
Appendix A of Eurocode 2 permits a reduction in material partial factors for reinforcing steel and concrete. Designing elements with the reduced material partial factors reduces the amount of reinforcement steel required, hence a reduction in embodied carbon and energy, without any loss of performance.
This article discusses timbers and carbon, availability and end-of-life issues.
Hear from the engineer behind the Structural Award-winning Newquay Harper Footbridge project - and get into the mindset of only doing what is necessary.
Muiris Moynihan MIStructE explains why use is so widespread, the materials' climate change impact, and why their responsible use is the realm of structural engineers.
Signatories to the Structural Engineers Declare climate emergency initiative convened at IStructE headquarters on 17 October to discuss the next steps the profession must take to address the emergency.
Practical guidance for structural engineers on minimising waste in design and construction.
This brief guidance details resource efficient design strategies including reducing the amount and waste of materials in design, prolonging the service of materials and designing in a resource efficient end of life.
A resource designed to help you understand typical operating energy consumption of buildings and place embodied carbon in context.
Outlining the complex carbon costs of infrastructure schemes.
How the choice of materials should be balanced with other factors to achieve sustainable outcomes.
An introduction to embodied and operational carbon, with links to guides and tools.
A brand new course delivered as a series of interactive online sessions. It will enable you to design structures with net zero emissions.
A technical debate around practical approaches towards implementing the circular economy within structural engineering and the construction industry.