Author: Muiris Moynihan
16 October 2019
This guidance provides practical advice on reducing waste regarding:
The sections below outline discrete steps an engineer can take to implement each of these concepts, with references to useful supporting material.
Reducing load values, partial factors and deflection limits can deliver significant reductions in material at the design stage, but must be consistently applied and agreed/coordinated with the client and supply chain.
Load values for commercial office in the UK are significantly larger1 (often imposed load of 4kN/m2 ) than the Eurocode values2 (2.5 kN/m2). A significant amount of material can be saved if the lower value can be agreed with the client.
Similarly, using the common deflection limits3 (eg span / 500) can lead to overdesign in many circumstances. Instead it should be understood what is driving the deflection criteria (eg facade tolerance requirement), where the limits can be relaxed (eg away from facade) and/ or what alternatives/trade-offs exist to change the limits (eg different facade systems).
Partial load factors for dead loads can be reduced by 5% if the dead weight of the structure is better controlled than typical4, for instance if it is manufactured off-site.
Partial material factors for concrete can be reduced to 1.4 (from 1.5) if a higher level of accuracy and control can be demonstrated in its construction5. This can be achieved through on and off-site methods (for instance increased supervision or more rigorous quality assurance processes) but requires collaborating with the supply chain to ensure there is a clear strategy to do so.
Designers should avoid the waste of overdesign by targeting 100% utilisation in every member; research indicates this could result in 30% less material in structures6. This is often entirely within the control of the structural engineer, provided they apply best practice:
For many projects the standard set of sections/ sizes for steel/ concrete/ timber will be appropriate, however if the project requires (either architecturally or structurally) bespoke sections then there may be opportunities to remove material by optimising section geometry or by varying the section along the length:
Both of these strategies require collaboration with the supply-chain to ensure the design intent can be delivered.
Certain designs can be built with less waste, if they consider and align with common practice and products within the supply chain. Equally some site conditions impose requirements on the design. Better understanding up and down the supply chain will lead to more efficient use of material:
All the above actions cannot be implemented in isolation. Changing assumptions, particularly if dependant on a precast solution, has client and commercial implications, whilst contractor/supply-chain involvement is crucial for many of the others, again with potential commercial, architectural and other impacts. Whilst the engineer cannot make such decisions unilaterally, they can:
 Minimising energy in construction: survey of structural engineering practice, University of Cambridge, 2018
 B1 General office areas, Table NA.2, UK NA to BS EN 1991-1-1:2002
 Concise Eurocode 2, Concrete Centre, 2006
 Common rules for precast concrete products, BS EN 13369:2013
 Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete structures, general rules and rules for buildings, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004. See also Sustainability Panel note Reduced Reinforcement through Reduced Material Partial Factors
 Moynihan, M. and Allwood, J, Utilisation of structural steel in buildings, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2014
 Going on a metal diet, WellMet2050, University of Cambridge, 2011
 Orr et al (2011), Concrete structures using fabric formwork, The Structural Engineer, 89 (8), pp. 20-26
Muiris Moynihan MIStructE explains why use is so widespread, the materials' climate change impact, and why their responsible use is the realm of structural engineers.
This brief guidance details resource efficient design strategies including reducing the amount and waste of materials in design, prolonging the service of materials and designing in a resource efficient end of life.
A resource designed to help you understand typical operating energy consumption of buildings and place embodied carbon in context.
How the choice of materials should be balanced with other factors to achieve sustainable outcomes.
An introduction to embodied and operational carbon, with links to guides and tools.
Outlining the complex carbon costs of infrastructure schemes.
This article discusses timbers and carbon, availability and end-of-life issues.
Appendix A of Eurocode 2 permits a reduction in material partial factors for reinforcing steel and concrete. Designing elements with the reduced material partial factors reduces the amount of reinforcement steel required, hence a reduction in embodied carbon and energy, without any loss of performance.
The UK will host the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow on 1 – 12 November 2021. A key component of the the summit will be the Built Environment Virtual Pavilion, which will showcase projects, events and content.
Jo reflects on her own career and looks ahead to 2050, discussing the role structural engineers play in creating safe, sustainable, inclusive and resilient cities.
A report from a project funded by a 2018 EEFIT Research Grant.
This report is an outcome of the analysis of data and information related to the damage and post-earthquake reconstruction of residential buildings, collected during the field survey by the authors, in light of 2015 Nepal earthquake sequence.
A poster from a project funded by the Institution's 2019/20 MSc Research Grants.
The 2020 prize-winning team present their response to the competition brief.
Examine approaches to help engineers decide when and where to use new materials